Catania Angela Maria, Dalmasso Alessandra, Morra Patrizia, Costa Emanuele, Bottero Maria Teresa, Di Ciccio Pierluigi Aldo
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Mar 17;16:1538456. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1538456. eCollection 2025.
spp. can produce biofilms and cause recurrent contamination in the food industry. The common clean-in-place (CIP) method is usually employed in sanitizing processing equipment. However, CIP is not always effective in removing biofilms. Ozone represents a promising "green" alternative to control biofilms. In this study, the effect of gaseous ozone (50 ppm) was evaluated against planktonic and sessile and isolates collected from the dairy sector. Planktonic cells were enumerated by plate counts after 10 min, 1 h, and 6 h of ozone treatment. After a short-term (10 min) exposure, a slight reduction in microbial loads (0.66-2.27 ± 0.15 Log CFU/mL) was observed for strains, whereas a more pronounced reduction (2.90-3.81 ± 0.12 Log CFU/mL) was noted in isolates. The microbial load further decreased after 1 h-treatments, around 1.5-3.46 ± 0.11 Log CFU/mL for strains, and 4.0-5.6 ± 0.11 Log CFU/mL for isolates, until complete inactivation of bacterial cells after 6 h of exposure. Moreover, the effect of gaseous ozone treatment (50 ppm, 6 h) was evaluated for its ability to inhibit and eradicate biofilms formed on two common food-contact materials (polystyrene and stainless steel). Sessile cells were the more sensitive to the action of ozone, while a weak effect was highlighted on isolates on both surface types. These results were further confirmed by scanning microscopy analysis. The number of cells in the biofilm state was also assessed, showing a not-complete correlation with a decrease in Biofilm Production Indices (BPIs). These findings highlighted the effectiveness of the sanitizing protocol using gaseous ozone in contrasting Bacillus free-living cells, but a not completely counteraction in biofilm formation (inhibition) or eradication of pre-formed biofilm. Thus, the application of ozone could be thought of not alone, but in combination with common sanitization practices to improve their effectiveness.
某些物种能够产生生物膜,并在食品工业中导致反复污染。常用的就地清洗(CIP)方法通常用于对加工设备进行消毒。然而,CIP在去除生物膜方面并不总是有效。臭氧是一种有前景的控制生物膜的“绿色”替代方法。在本研究中,评估了气态臭氧(50 ppm)对从乳制品行业收集的浮游菌和固着菌及分离株的影响。在臭氧处理10分钟、1小时和6小时后,通过平板计数法对浮游细胞进行计数。短期(10分钟)暴露后,观察到某些菌株的微生物负荷略有降低(0.66 - 2.27 ± 0.15 Log CFU/mL),而某些分离株的微生物负荷降低更为明显(2.90 - 3.81 ± 0.12 Log CFU/mL)。经过1小时处理后,微生物负荷进一步降低,某些菌株约为1.5 - 3.46 ± 0.11 Log CFU/mL,某些分离株为4.0 - 5.6 ± 0.11 Log CFU/mL,直至暴露6小时后细菌细胞完全失活。此外,评估了气态臭氧处理(50 ppm,6小时)抑制和根除在两种常见食品接触材料(聚苯乙烯和不锈钢)上形成的生物膜的能力。固着菌对臭氧的作用更敏感,而在两种表面类型上对某些分离株的影响较弱。扫描显微镜分析进一步证实了这些结果。还评估了生物膜状态下的细胞数量,结果表明其与生物膜产生指数(BPI)的降低不完全相关。这些发现突出了使用气态臭氧的消毒方案在对抗芽孢杆菌游离细胞方面的有效性,但在生物膜形成(抑制)或根除预先形成的生物膜方面并非完全有效。因此,臭氧的应用不应单独考虑,可以与常见的消毒方法结合使用以提高其有效性。