Battaglia Claudia Stella Pereira, Parente Ana Alice Amaral Ibiapina, Luiz Ronir Raggio, Aurilio Rafaela Baroni, Pinheiro Michely Alexandrino de Souza, Sant'Anna Maria de Fátima Bazhuni Pombo, Sant'Anna Clemax Couto
. Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.
. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.
J Bras Pneumol. 2025 Mar 31;51(1):e20240241. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240241. eCollection 2025.
To evaluate the contribution of Ultra to the diagnosis of pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB).
We analyzed prospective data from children and adolescents with presumed PTB whose specimens were tested with Ultra between January 2020 and December 2022. Diagnosis was based on clinical-radiological criteria, clinical response after a two-month treatment period, and microbiological analysis. Ultra was considered positive with a result of 'Detected' and 'Traces' in children under 10 years and in HIV-infected individuals. Fisher's exact test was used for group comparisons, and McNemar's test was used to compare Ultra results with the diagnostic presumption. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee (CAAE No. 02173518.2.0000.5264).
A total of 41 patients were included, of whom 63% (26/41) were diagnosed with PTB. Among these, 9/26 (34%) had positive results only through Ultra, with negative AFB and culture. The sensitivity and specificity of Ultra were 50% (13/26) and 100% (15/15), respectively. The PPV was 100% (13/13), and the NPV was 54% (15/28). Of these 28 (68%) patients with negative Ultra results, 13 (46%) were diagnosed with PTB, mostly by MoH-SS. Considering culture as the reference, the PPV and NPV were 67% and 100%, respectively.
Ultra significantly contributed to the diagnosis of pediatric PTB, proving to be a promising tool for paucibacillary forms of the disease. However, it should not be used alone. Integrating laboratory tests with clinical evaluation is essential to improving diagnostic accuracy and the management of pediatric TB.
评估Ultra在儿童肺结核(PTB)诊断中的作用。
我们分析了2020年1月至2022年12月期间疑似PTB的儿童和青少年的前瞻性数据,这些患者的标本用Ultra进行了检测。诊断基于临床放射学标准、两个月治疗期后的临床反应以及微生物学分析。10岁以下儿童和HIV感染者中,Ultra结果为“检测到”和“微量”被视为阳性。采用Fisher精确检验进行组间比较,使用McNemar检验比较Ultra结果与诊断推测。该研究经伦理委员会批准(CAAE编号:02173518.2.0000.5264)。
共纳入41例患者,其中63%(26/41)被诊断为PTB。其中,9/26(34%)仅通过Ultra检测呈阳性,抗酸杆菌(AFB)和培养结果为阴性。Ultra的敏感性和特异性分别为50%(13/26)和100%(15/15)。阳性预测值(PPV)为100%(13/13),阴性预测值(NPV)为54%(15/28)。在这28例(68%)Ultra结果为阴性的患者中,13例(46%)被诊断为PTB,大多通过卫生部痰涂片(MoH-SS)诊断。以培养结果作为参考,PPV和NPV分别为67%和100%。
Ultra对儿童PTB的诊断有显著贡献,被证明是诊断该疾病少菌型的一种有前景的工具。然而,不应单独使用。将实验室检查与临床评估相结合对于提高儿童结核病的诊断准确性和管理至关重要。