Choi Yangji, De Ridder David, Greub Gilbert
Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne.
Group of Geospatial Molecular Epidemiology (GEOME), Laboratory for Biological Geochemistry (LGB), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne.
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2025 May 1;20(3):287-293. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000936. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges, particularly in understanding its complex spatial transmission patterns. The high transmissibility of the virus led to frequent super-spreading events. These events demonstrated clear spatial clustering patterns, often tied to specific events that facilitated transmission. The uneven geographic distribution of medical resources and varying access to care amplified the impact of SARS-CoV-2. Asymptomatic cases further complicated the situation, as infected individuals could silently spread the virus before being identified.Thus, this review examines how genomic and spatial epidemiology approaches can be integrated to answer some of the above-mentioned challenges. We first describe the methodological foundations of genomics and spatial epidemiology, detailing opportunities of their applications during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We then present a novel interdisciplinary framework that combines these approaches to better guide public health interventions.
During the pandemic, the genomic and spatial approaches were used to address key questions, including "how does the pathogen evolve and diversify?" and "how does the pathogen spread geographically?". Genomic epidemiology allows researchers to identify viral lineages and new variants. Conversely, spatial epidemiology focused on geographic distribution of infections, analyzing how the virus spread. However, despite their complementary nature, these approaches were largely applied independently during the pandemic. This separation limited our collective ability to fully understand the complex relationships between viral evolution and geographic spread.
While phylogeography has traditionally combined phylogenetic and geographic data to understand long-term evolutionary patterns across large areas, events such as the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic demand frameworks that can inform public health interventions through joint analysis of genomic and local-scale spatial data.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行带来了前所未有的挑战,尤其是在理解其复杂的空间传播模式方面。该病毒的高传播性导致频繁出现超级传播事件。这些事件呈现出明显的空间聚集模式,通常与促进传播的特定事件相关。医疗资源的地理分布不均以及获得医疗服务的机会各异,放大了SARS-CoV-2的影响。无症状病例使情况进一步复杂化,因为感染者在被识别之前可能会悄然传播病毒。因此,本综述探讨如何整合基因组学和空间流行病学方法来应对上述一些挑战。我们首先描述基因组学和空间流行病学的方法学基础,详细说明它们在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间的应用机会。然后我们提出一个新颖的跨学科框架,将这些方法结合起来,以更好地指导公共卫生干预措施。
在大流行期间,基因组学和空间方法被用于解决关键问题,包括“病原体如何进化和多样化?”以及“病原体如何在地理上传播?”。基因组流行病学使研究人员能够识别病毒谱系和新变种。相反,空间流行病学关注感染的地理分布,分析病毒的传播方式。然而,尽管它们具有互补性,但在大流行期间这些方法大多是独立应用的。这种分离限制了我们全面理解病毒进化与地理传播之间复杂关系的集体能力。
虽然系统发育地理学传统上结合系统发育和地理数据来理解大面积的长期进化模式,但诸如最近的SARS-CoV-2大流行等事件需要能够通过联合分析基因组和局部尺度空间数据为公共卫生干预提供信息的框架。