Edelman Alexandra, Vinyals Torres Lluis, Kazi Anis, Rasanathan Kumanan, Marten Robert
Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia
College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Apr 2;10(Suppl 2):e017442. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017442.
In the WHO Western Pacific Region, primary health care (PHC) is considered 'the future of health' and the key to achieving universal health coverage. However, political, economic and social forces underlying curative, hospital-centric models have eroded public, local-level health service capacity-contributing to fragmented systems and persisting health inequities. Drawing insights from seven published country case studies from East Asia examining PHC in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper discusses key factors influencing the implementation of PHC. Countries are improving service delivery through a PHC approach, but persisting governance and structural barriers to PHC reform include vertical approaches to health care planning and programme delivery, health workforce shortages and maldistribution, and market forces that have shaped health care and workforce models towards curative care. Three domains for future policy and research to strengthen PHC are proposed. First, managing the political economy of PHC reform requires mapping relationships and systematically unravelling political, social and economic factors shaping accountability, receptiveness and capacity for change. Second, strengthening participatory governance involves shifting power to communities through platforms for shared policy creation and implementation, decentralised governance and empowering community-oriented health workers. Third, improving conceptual clarity and policy guidance on PHC can use the Sustainable Development Goals to orient systems towards preventing illness and valuing good health. The case studies offer a practice model of applied health policy and systems research coproduced with policy stakeholders.
在世界卫生组织西太平洋区域,初级卫生保健被视为“卫生事业的未来”以及实现全民健康覆盖的关键。然而,以治疗为中心、以医院为导向的模式背后的政治、经济和社会力量侵蚀了公共的、地方层面的卫生服务能力,导致卫生系统碎片化以及健康不平等现象持续存在。本文借鉴了东亚地区已发表的七篇国家案例研究,这些研究在新冠疫情背景下审视了初级卫生保健,探讨了影响初级卫生保健实施的关键因素。各国正通过初级卫生保健方法改善服务提供,但初级卫生保健改革中持续存在的治理和结构障碍包括卫生保健规划和项目实施的垂直方法、卫生人力短缺和分布不均,以及塑造了面向治疗的卫生保健和劳动力模式的市场力量。本文提出了未来加强初级卫生保健的政策和研究的三个领域。第一,管理初级卫生保健改革的政治经济学需要梳理各种关系,并系统地剖析影响问责制、接受度和变革能力的政治、社会和经济因素。第二,加强参与式治理涉及通过共享政策制定和实施的平台、分权治理以及增强以社区为导向的卫生工作者权能,将权力转移给社区。第三,提高对初级卫生保健的概念清晰度和政策指导,可以利用可持续发展目标来引导卫生系统预防疾病并重视健康。这些案例研究提供了一个与政策利益相关者共同开展应用卫生政策和系统研究的实践模式。