Xin Bo, Zhao Qiuli, Chen Dong, Ma Dexin, Su Han, Jiang Wenhui
Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta West Road 76#, Xi'an, 710061, China.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 12;13(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02700-5.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers, and the risk of CRC is substantially greater in a high-risk population than in the general population. However, no existing assessment instruments have been specifically designed to evaluate CRC prevention behaviors in a high-risk population. The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically validate an information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) questionnaire tailored for the population at high risk for CRC (IMB-CRC) to assess the factors influencing prevention behaviors.
This cross-sectional study was conducted in northeastern China. The initial questionnaire items were derived from a comprehensive literature review, semistructured interviews analyzed via content analysis, and expert focus group discussions. Content validity was assessed through expert consultation using the Delphi method, and face validity was evaluated in the high-risk population for CRC. Explanatory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on Sample 1 (N = 287) to identify underlying factors, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on Sample 2 (N = 224) to validate the model. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also examined to ensure the stability and consistency of the questionnaire.
The final IMB-CRC comprises 21 items distributed across four dimensions: prevention information (7 items), objective skills (5 items), self-efficacy (5 items), and motivation (4 items), collectively accounting for 61.99% of the variance. CFA indicated that the proposed model fit the data well (χ2/df = 1.779, RMSEA = 0.059, AGFI = 0.852, GFI = 0.883, CFI = 0.950, IFI = 0.951, TLI = 0.943, and NFI = 0.894). The item content validity index (I-CVI) for individual items ranged from 0.905 to 1, and the scale content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.952, suggesting good content validity. The IMB-CRC demonstrated high reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.937, McDonald's omega of 0.939, and test-retest reliability of 0.919. Significant positive correlations were observed between the IMB-CRC and each of its four dimensions, indicating that higher IMB-CRC scores were associated with greater engagement in cancer prevention behaviors among the high-risk population.
The IMB-CRC exhibited appropriate validity and reliability, indicating that this questionnaire is a robust tool for assessing behavioral components essential for CRC prevention in the high-risk population. Health care professionals and policymakers can use the IMB-CRC to develop targeted CRC risk communication and behavioral education strategies, thereby improving the preventive abilities of a high-risk population.
结直肠癌(CRC)是最常见的癌症之一,高危人群患CRC的风险显著高于普通人群。然而,目前尚无专门设计用于评估高危人群CRC预防行为的评估工具。本研究的目的是开发并进行心理测量学验证一种针对CRC高危人群量身定制的信息-动机-行为技能(IMB)问卷(IMB-CRC),以评估影响预防行为的因素。
本横断面研究在中国东北地区进行。初始问卷项目源自全面的文献综述、通过内容分析进行分析的半结构化访谈以及专家焦点小组讨论。通过德尔菲法进行专家咨询评估内容效度,并在CRC高危人群中评估表面效度。对样本1(N = 287)进行探索性因子分析(EFA)以识别潜在因子,对样本2(N = 224)进行验证性因子分析(CFA)以验证模型。还检查了内部一致性和重测信度,以确保问卷的稳定性和一致性。
最终的IMB-CRC包括21个项目,分布在四个维度:预防信息(7项)、客观技能(5项)、自我效能感(5项)和动机(4项),共同解释了61.99%的方差。CFA表明所提出的模型与数据拟合良好(χ2/df = 1.779,RMSEA = 0.059,AGFI = 0.852,GFI = 0.883,CFI = 0.950,IFI = 0.951,TLI = 0.943,NFI = 0.894)。单个项目的项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)范围为0.905至1,量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.952,表明具有良好的内容效度。IMB-CRC显示出高信度,Cronbach's alpha为0.937,McDonald's omega为0.939,重测信度为0.919。在IMB-CRC与其四个维度之间均观察到显著的正相关,表明在高危人群中,IMB-CRC得分越高与更多地参与癌症预防行为相关。
IMB-CRC表现出适当的效度和信度,表明该问卷是评估高危人群CRC预防所需行为成分的有力工具。医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者可使用IMB-CRC制定有针对性的CRC风险沟通和行为教育策略,从而提高高危人群的预防能力。