Daver Naval G, Vyas Paresh, Huls Gerwin A, Döhner Hartmut, Maury Sebastien, Novak Jan, Papayannidis Cristina, Martinez Chamorro Carmen, Montesinos Pau, Niroula Rabin, Fenaux Pierre, Esteve Jordi, Wu Shang-Ju, De Voeght Adrien, Mayer Jiri, Valk Peter J M, Johnson Lisa, Dong Mei, Liu Ke, Kuwahara Sowmya Banda, Caldwell Kenneth, Guru Murthy Guru Subramanian
University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
MRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Weatherall Institute of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Blood. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024027506.
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC) have limited treatment options. The phase 3 ENHANCE-3 study aimed to determine whether magrolimab (magrolimab arm) was superior to placebo (control arm) when either was combined with venetoclax and azacitidine. Adults with previously untreated AML who were ineligible for IC were randomized to receive magrolimab (1 mg/kg on days 1 and 4, 15 mg/kg on day 8, 30 mg/kg on days 11 and 15, then weekly for 5 weeks, then every 2 weeks) or placebo, venetoclax (100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, and 400 mg daily thereafter), and azacitidine (75 mg/m2 days 1-7) in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); key secondary endpoints included complete remission (CR) rate and safety. After randomization of 378 patients, the trial was stopped at a prespecified interim analysis due to futility. At final analysis, with median follow-up of 7.6 months (magrolimab arm) vs 7.4 months (control arm), median OS was 10.7 vs 14.1 months (HR, 1.178 [95% CI, 0.848-1.637]). The CR rate within 6 cycles was 41.3% vs 46.0%. Addition of magrolimab to venetoclax and azacitidine resulted in more fatal adverse events (19.0% vs 11.4%), primarily driven by grade 5 infections (11.1% vs 6.5%) and respiratory events (2.6% vs 0%). There were similar incidences of any-grade infections, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia between arms. These results highlight the difficulty in improving outcomes for patients with AML ineligible for IC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05079230.
不符合强化化疗(IC)条件的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的治疗选择有限。3期ENHANCE-3研究旨在确定马格罗利单抗(马格罗利单抗组)与维奈克拉和阿扎胞苷联合使用时是否优于安慰剂(对照组)。不符合IC条件的既往未治疗的成年AML患者被随机分组,接受马格罗利单抗(第1天和第4天为1mg/kg,第8天为15mg/kg,第11天和第15天为30mg/kg,然后每周一次,共5周,之后每2周一次)或安慰剂、维奈克拉(第1天100mg,第2天200mg,此后每日400mg)以及阿扎胞苷(第1 - 7天75mg/m²),每28天为一个周期。主要终点是总生存期(OS);关键次要终点包括完全缓解(CR)率和安全性。在378例患者随机分组后,由于无效性,该试验在预先设定的中期分析时停止。在最终分析中,中位随访时间马格罗利单抗组为7.6个月,对照组为7.4个月,中位OS分别为10.7个月和14.1个月(HR,1.178 [95% CI,0.848 - 1.637])。6个周期内的CR率分别为41.3%和46.0%。在维奈克拉和阿扎胞苷基础上加用马格罗利单抗导致更多致命不良事件(19.0%对11.4%),主要由5级感染(11.1%对6.5%)和呼吸事件(2.6%对0%)驱动。两组之间任何级别的感染、发热性中性粒细胞减少症和中性粒细胞减少症的发生率相似。这些结果凸显了改善不符合IC条件的AML患者预后的困难程度。该试验在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册,编号为#NCT05079230。