Suppr超能文献

在一个大型前瞻性队列中评估早发性结直肠癌的风险因素。

Evaluating Risk Factors for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in a Large, Prospective Cohort.

作者信息

Sandhu Sunny, Blandon Catherine, Kumar Shria

机构信息

Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine at the University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St, Locator Code C-240, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine at the University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St, Locator Code C-240, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09055-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the worrisome rise of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), risk factors have not been definitively established. We use a large, granular database to evaluate risk factors for EOCRC, investigate differences in associations with EOCRC and later-onset CRC (LOCRC), and compare metrics of accelerated aging, a hypothesized driver of EOCRC.

METHODS

This was a case-control analysis within the UK Biobank. Risk factors for each cancer were identified and compared, including aging measures (chronological age, telomere length, PhenoAge, and homeostatic dysregulation).

RESULTS

A total of 31,164 persons were matched. We found an increased risk of EOCRC with PRS (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.19-1.97; p < 0.001). LOCRC was associated with increasing PRS (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.44 - 1.53; p < 0.001), increasing waist-to-hip ratio (OR 5.81; 95% CI 3.25 - 10.38; p < 0.001), family history of CRC (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.16 - 1.40; p < 0.001), and history of smoking (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 - 1.19; p = 0.01). Male sex and prior CRC screening were associated with reduced risk of LOCRC. The inclusion of PhenoAge as the measure of aging demonstrated the best model fit for both EOCRC and LOCRC. For each year that PhenoAge exceeded chronological age, the odds of EOCRC increased by 7%, while odds of LOCRC only increased by 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Within this study, we find that genetic risk variants are a significant driver of EOCRC risk. Accelerated aging appears to be associated with increased risk of both EOCRC and LOCRC, and measures such as PhenoAge warrant continued study.

摘要

背景

尽管早发性结直肠癌(EOCRC)的发病率令人担忧地上升,但风险因素尚未明确确定。我们使用一个大型的详细数据库来评估EOCRC的风险因素,研究与EOCRC和晚发性结直肠癌(LOCRC)相关联的差异,并比较加速衰老的指标,加速衰老被认为是EOCRC的一个驱动因素。

方法

这是在英国生物银行内进行的病例对照分析。确定并比较了每种癌症的风险因素,包括衰老指标(实际年龄、端粒长度、表型年龄和内稳态失调)。

结果

总共匹配了31164人。我们发现,多基因风险评分(PRS)会增加EOCRC的风险(比值比[OR]为1.53;95%置信区间[CI]为1.19 - 1.97;p < 0.001)。LOCRC与PRS增加(OR为1.48;95% CI为1.44 - 1.53;p < 0.001)、腰臀比增加(OR为5.81;95% CI为3.25 - 10.38;p < 0.001)、结直肠癌家族史(OR为1.27;95% CI为1.16 - 1.40;p < 0.001)以及吸烟史(OR为1.11;95% CI为1.03 - 1.19;p = 0.01)相关。男性性别和既往结直肠癌筛查与LOCRC风险降低相关。将表型年龄作为衰老指标纳入分析显示,其对EOCRC和LOCRC的模型拟合效果最佳。表型年龄每超过实际年龄一岁,EOCRC的发病几率增加7%,而LOCRC的发病几率仅增加1%。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现遗传风险变异是EOCRC风险的一个重要驱动因素。加速衰老似乎与EOCRC和LOCRC的风险增加都有关,像表型年龄这样的指标值得继续研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验