Suppr超能文献

医疗保健提供者、老年人及其护理人员之间药物管理决策相关的沟通流程:一项系统综述

Communication Processes Related to Decision-Making in Medication Management Between Healthcare Providers, Older People and Their Carers: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Copley Deana M, Manias Elizabeth, Watkins Vanessa, Hutchinson Alison M

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70252. doi: 10.1111/hex.70252.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine decision-making between healthcare providers (HCPs), older people and their carers in relation to medication management.

METHODS

Four databases were systematically searched up to June 2023. Two authors screened the search results. Extracted quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Fifty-three papers reporting on 49 studies were included. A variety of research methods were utilised. Few authors provided a definition of shared decision-making (SDM). Three major themes were identified: provider-driven decision-making, patient-driven decision-making and a shared role in decision-making. Some older people preferred or deferred to provider-driven decision-making, mainly due to trust in the HCP's expertise. Other reasons for provider-driven decision-making were patient anxiety, declining health, lack of medical knowledge or poor communication during the clinical encounter. Evidence of patient-driven decision-making was often prompted by concerns about the adverse effects of medication. Most older people preferred or adopted a shared role in decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Whilst most patients and carers preferred to engage in SDM related to medication management, at times, they felt unable to do so, deferring to provider-driven decision-making. There is a need for a standardised definition and measurement of SDM.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This systematic review did not directly involve older people or carers of older people in the design or conduct of the review. However, the findings will inform a qualitative study aimed at exploring older people and their carers' experiences of medication-related decision-making in collaboration with their healthcare provider.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42019124862.

摘要

目的

探讨医疗服务提供者(HCPs)、老年人及其护理人员在药物管理方面的决策情况。

方法

系统检索了截至2023年6月的四个数据库。由两位作者筛选检索结果。对提取的定量数据进行描述性分析,对定性数据进行主题分析。

结果

纳入了53篇报道49项研究的论文。采用了多种研究方法。很少有作者对共同决策(SDM)进行定义。确定了三个主要主题:提供者主导的决策、患者主导的决策以及决策中的共同作用。一些老年人倾向于或听从提供者主导的决策,主要是因为信任医疗服务提供者的专业知识。提供者主导决策的其他原因包括患者焦虑、健康状况下降、缺乏医学知识或临床诊疗过程中沟通不畅。患者主导决策的证据通常是由对药物不良反应的担忧引发的。大多数老年人倾向于或在决策中采用共同作用的方式。

结论

虽然大多数患者和护理人员倾向于参与与药物管理相关的共同决策,但有时他们感到无法做到,只能听从提供者主导的决策。需要对共同决策进行标准化的定义和衡量。

患者或公众参与

本系统评价在设计或实施过程中没有直接让老年人或老年人的护理人员参与。然而,研究结果将为一项定性研究提供信息,该定性研究旨在与医疗服务提供者合作,探索老年人及其护理人员在药物相关决策方面的经历。

试验注册

CRD42019124862。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca9/12010048/166449581db2/HEX-28-e70252-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验