Suppr超能文献

晚期鼻咽癌的诱导化疗与同步化疗对比

Induction versus Concurrent Chemotherapy for Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

作者信息

Huang Pei-Yu, Chen Xu-Yin, Ding Xi, Guo Ling, Mo Hao-Yuan, Zou Xiong, Duan Chong-Yang, Ling Li, You Rui, Yang Xin, Liu You-Ping, Xie Yu-Long, Zhang Yi-Nuan, Cao Jing-Yu, Liu Si-Han, Wang Zi-Meng, Yang Qi, Lin Chao, Chen Si-Yuan, Ouyang Yan-Feng, Liu Yong-Long, Wen Kai, Duan Xiao-Tong, Jiang Rou, Liu Rong-Zeng, Yu Tao, Qiu Fang, Hua Yi-Jun, Cao Ka-Jia, Luo Dong-Hua, Chen Ming-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou, China.

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, P. R. China.

出版信息

NEJM Evid. 2025 May;4(5):EVIDoa2400214. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2400214. Epub 2025 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the mainstay treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), which usually leads to intolerable toxicities. We investigated whether or not induction chemotherapy (IC) plus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) could replace CCRT.

METHODS

This is an open-label, phase 3, noninferiority trial. Patients with stage T1-4N2-3 or T3-4N0-1 LA-NPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) and cisplatin (80 mg/m) for two cycles followed by IMRT, or IMRT plus concomitant weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m) for up to seven cycles. Two-year failure-free survival (FFS) was the primary end point, and noninferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for a hazard ratio of less than 2.12 (absolute margin of -10 percentage points). Secondary end points include overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, toxicity profile, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

We enrolled 124 patients in the IC group and 125 patients in the CCRT group. The median follow-up was 60 months. Two-year FFS was 90.2% for IC versus 86.3% for CCRT, with a hazard ratio of 0.636 (95% CI, 0.267 to 1.514) and an absolute difference of 3.9 percentage points (95% CI, -5.2 to 13.0). Compared with the CCRT group, fewer grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in the IC group (47.5% vs. 61.5%; P=0.029), including leukopenia, anemia, mucositis, nausea, and dysphagia. IC was associated with better QoL, including global health status, social and cognitive functioning, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, appetite loss, and constipation.

CONCLUSIONS

For 2-year FFS for LA-NPC, gemcitabine and cisplatin IC plus IMRT alone was noninferior to CCRT. (Funded by Key-Area Research and Development of Guangdong Province and others.).

摘要

背景

基于顺铂的同步放化疗(CCRT)是局部晚期鼻咽癌(LA-NPC)的主要治疗方法,但通常会导致难以耐受的毒性。我们研究了诱导化疗(IC)联合调强放疗(IMRT)是否可以替代CCRT。

方法

这是一项开放标签、3期、非劣效性试验。T1-4N2-3期或T3-4N0-1期LA-NPC患者被随机分配(1:1)接受吉西他滨(1000 mg/m²)和顺铂(80 mg/m²)两个周期,随后进行IMRT,或IMRT联合每周一次顺铂(40 mg/m²)共七个周期。两年无失败生存率(FFS)是主要终点,非劣效性通过危险比的95%置信区间(CI)上限小于2.12(绝对差值为-10个百分点)来确认。次要终点包括总生存率、局部区域无复发生存率、远处转移无复发生存率、毒性特征和生活质量(QoL)。

结果

我们在IC组纳入了124例患者,在CCRT组纳入了125例患者。中位随访时间为60个月。IC组的两年FFS为90.2%,CCRT组为

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验