Reddy Vivek Y, Gerstenfeld Edward P, Schmidt Boris, Andrade Jason G, Nair Devi, Natale Andrea, Saliba Walid, Sommer Philipp, Metzner Andreas, Verma Atul, Hounshell Troy, Amin Anish, Gentlesk Philip, Weiner Stanislav, Cuoco Frank A, Kim Jamie, Turagam Mohit K, Tomassoni Gery, Patel Chinmay, Issa Ziad, Shehata Michael, Anderson Allison M, Stoltz Thomas J, Raybuck Jonathan D, Schwartz Torri, Sutton Brad S, Mansour Moussa
Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, New York, NY (V.Y.R., M.K.T.).
University of California San Francisco (E.P.G.).
Circulation. 2025 Jul 8;152(1):27-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074485. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
There are sparse high-quality safety and effectiveness data for pulsed field ablation (PFA) of persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF), in which lesions beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are often placed. In addition, no large trials have used insertable cardiac monitors for continuous rhythm monitoring after ablation in patients with PerAF or after PFA in any atrial fibrillation population. In Phase 2 of the ADVANTAGE AF study (A Prospective Single Arm Open Label Study of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System in Subjects With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation), patients with PerAF underwent PFA for PVI and posterior wall ablation (PWA) and, in a subcohort, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter.
Patients with PerAF underwent PVI and posterior wall ablation with the pentaspline PFA catheter and cavotricuspid isthmus with a novel focal-linear PFA catheter after intravenous nitroglycerin prophylaxis. Patients were followed up for 1 year with continuous rhythm monitoring after ablation with insertable cardiac monitors to emulate traditional intermittent monitoring for the primary efficacy end point and to examine atrial arrhythmia (AA) burden and episode duration.
This 255-patient cohort (age, 66.7±9.3 years; female, 29%; CHADS-VASc score, 2.4±1.4; body mass index, 30.9±5.3 kg/m; left atrium diameter, 4.3±0.6 cm) underwent PVI plus posterior wall ablation (99.6%/100% acute success); a subpopulation (n=141; 55.3%) also received cavotricuspid isthmus PFA, with 98.6% achieving bidirectional block without complications (ST-segment changes, ventricular fibrillation). Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation took 8±13 minutes, using 18±6 pulsed field applications and 4±2 mg IV nitroglycerin. The total procedure and atrial dwell times were 105±36 and 59±24 minutes, respectively. Mimicking traditional monitoring, freedom from AA was 73.4% with adverse events in 2.4%, both meeting prespecified end-point criteria. Freedom from recurrent atrial flutter was 97.2%. Detailed analysis of the full insertable cardiac monitor data revealed freedom from AA of ≥30 seconds in 52.0%, and no episode exceeded 24 hours in 94.0% of this PerAF cohort. Both an AA burden >0.1% and longest episode duration >1 hour were predictive of increased health care use. One-year procedural effectiveness was 71.6% and 70.0% using the thresholds of ≤0.1% burden and <1 hour duration, respectively.
In Phase 2 of ADVANTAGE AF, the first multicenter PerAF study of PFA with continuous rhythm monitoring: (1) cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with nitroglycerin prophylaxis was safe and effective, (2) PVI plus posterior wall ablation was safe and effective, and (3) an AA burden <0.1% and AA episode <1 hour duration were end points associated with the lowest health care use.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05443594.
对于持续性心房颤动(PerAF)的脉冲场消融(PFA),高质量的安全性和有效性数据较少,其中常进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)以外的消融。此外,尚无大型试验在PerAF患者消融后或在任何心房颤动人群中进行PFA后使用植入式心脏监测器进行连续心律监测。在ADVANTAGE AF研究的2期(一项关于FARAPULSE脉冲场消融系统用于持续性心房颤动患者的前瞻性单臂开放标签研究)中,PerAF患者接受了PFA进行PVI和后壁消融(PWA),并且在一个亚组中,进行了三尖瓣峡部消融以治疗典型心房扑动。
PerAF患者在静脉注射硝酸甘油预防后,使用五棱形PFA导管进行PVI和后壁消融,并使用新型局灶-线性PFA导管进行三尖瓣峡部消融。患者在消融后使用植入式心脏监测器进行连续心律监测随访1年,以模拟传统的间歇性监测作为主要疗效终点,并检查房性心律失常(AA)负担和发作持续时间。
这个255例患者的队列(年龄66.7±9.3岁;女性29%;CHADS-VASc评分2.4±1.4;体重指数30.9±5.3kg/m;左心房直径为4.3±0.6cm)接受了PVI加后壁消融(急性成功率为99.6%/100%);一个亚组(n=141;55.3%)也接受了三尖瓣峡部PFA,98.6%实现双向阻滞且无并发症(ST段改变、心室颤动)。三尖瓣峡部消融耗时8±13分钟,使用18±6次脉冲场应用和4±2mg静脉注射硝酸甘油。总手术时间和心房停留时间分别为105±36分钟和59±24分钟。模拟传统监测,无AA的比例为73.4%,不良事件发生率为2.4%,均符合预先设定的终点标准。无复发性心房扑动的比例为97.2%。对完整的植入式心脏监测器数据进行详细分析显示,该PerAF队列中52.0%的患者无≥30秒的AA,94.0%的患者无发作超过24小时的情况。AA负担>0.1%和最长发作持续时间>1小时均预示着医疗保健使用增加。使用≤0.1%负担和<1小时持续时间的阈值,1年的手术有效性分别为71.6%和70.0%。
在ADVANTAGE AF研究的2期,这是第一项对PFA进行连续心律监测的多中心PerAF研究:(1)硝酸甘油预防下的三尖瓣峡部消融安全有效,(2)PVI加后壁消融安全有效,(3)AA负担<0.1%和AA发作持续时间<1小时是与最低医疗保健使用相关的终点。