Suppr超能文献

消毒剂对与家禽饮用水系统相关的不同生物膜形成微生物的有效性。

Effectiveness of sanitizers on different biofilm-forming microorganisms associated with the poultry drinking water system.

作者信息

Ogundipe Tolulope T, Obe Tomi

机构信息

Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; Department of Food Science, Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2025 Jul;104(7):105122. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105122. Epub 2025 Apr 17.

Abstract

The sanitation of the poultry drinking water system (DWS) is essential to controlling pathogens and biofilms in the DWS. Intervention approaches including several sanitizers have been developed, but there is limited information on the efficacy of some of these sanitizers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of peracid-based (PAB), peroxide-based (PB), and hypochlorite-based (HB) sanitizers against field-isolated Salmonella (10), E. coli (2) and Bacillus (2), along with their antibiofilm effects on six of these bacterial strains on polyvinylchloride (PVC), a common DWS pipe material. The minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (MIC and MBC) were determined using the microdilution broth method. For biofilm production, PVC rings were inoculated (5-6 Log CFU/mL) in buffered peptone water, incubated at 30°C for 48 h, and detached with cotton swabs for quantification. The antibiofilm effect of the sanitizers was further assessed at MIC, 2X-MIC, 4X-MIC, and water (control). Data was analyzed using ANOVA and Least squares in JMP Pro 18. The MIC and MBC of PAB for all isolates ranged from 11.36 to 28.42 ppm, PB from 15.26 to 71.21 ppm, and HB was 106.67 to 350 ppm. Bacillus licheniformis formed the most biofilm (5.39 Log CFU/mL) as single-species bacteria while Salmonella attached more (6.36 Log CFU/mL) than E. coli (5.41 Log CFU/mL) and Bacillus (2.08 Log CFU/mL) when grown together in mixed cultures. PAB and HB eliminated the biofilms of all strains tested at MIC in mixed-species cultures while PB had no significant effect. Overall, PAB demonstrated the greatest potential as a DWS sanitizer, showing superior efficacy against planktonic and biofilm cells compared to PB and HB. This research highlights the importance of targeted microbial profiling and sanitizer efficacy testing for pre-harvest pathogen control, providing valuable insights for enhancing food safety in poultry production systems.

摘要

家禽饮用水系统(DWS)的卫生对于控制该系统中的病原体和生物膜至关重要。已经开发了包括几种消毒剂在内的干预方法,但关于其中一些消毒剂的功效信息有限。本研究的目的是评估过酸基(PAB)、过氧化物基(PB)和次氯酸盐基(HB)消毒剂对现场分离的沙门氏菌(10株)、大肠杆菌(2株)和芽孢杆菌(2株)的有效性,以及它们对聚氯乙烯(PVC,一种常见的DWS管材)上的六种此类细菌菌株的抗生物膜作用。使用微量稀释肉汤法测定最低抑菌浓度和杀菌浓度(MIC和MBC)。对于生物膜形成,将PVC环接种(5-6 Log CFU/mL)于缓冲蛋白胨水中,在30°C下孵育48小时,并用棉签分离以进行定量。在MIC、2X-MIC、4X-MIC和水(对照)条件下进一步评估消毒剂的抗生物膜作用。使用JMP Pro 18中的方差分析和最小二乘法分析数据。PAB对所有分离株的MIC和MBC范围为11.36至28.42 ppm,PB为15.26至71.21 ppm,HB为106.67至350 ppm。地衣芽孢杆菌作为单一物种细菌形成的生物膜最多(5.39 Log CFU/mL),而在混合培养中生长时,沙门氏菌附着的比大肠杆菌(5.41 Log CFU/mL)和芽孢杆菌(2.08 Log CFU/mL)更多(6.36 Log CFU/mL)。在混合物种培养中,PAB和HB在MIC时消除了所有测试菌株的生物膜,而PB没有显著效果。总体而言,PAB作为DWS消毒剂显示出最大潜力,与PB和HB相比,对浮游细胞和生物膜细胞具有更高的功效。这项研究强调了针对收获前病原体控制进行靶向微生物分析和消毒剂功效测试的重要性,为提高家禽生产系统中的食品安全提供了有价值的见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验