Kirkpatrick Emma, Keane Olivia A, Ourshalimian Shadassa, Ing Madeleine, Odegard Marjorie, Kim Eugene, Kelley-Quon Lorraine I
Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
J Surg Res. 2025 Jun;310:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.057. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
Most adolescents report unused opioids after surgery. Current interventions compare opioid prescribing between surgeons without capturing actual patient-reported use.
We recruited pediatric surgery residents, fellows, advanced practitioners, and surgeons from four surgical divisions at a tertiary care children's hospital. Providers reviewed clinical vignettes based on adolescent-reported postoperative opioid use data from our institution. Afterward, providers were asked to select the number of opioid pills they would prescribe and compare their responses to adolescent-reported use. We then measured provider willingness to change prescribing practices based on this comparison.
Overall, provider response rate was 41.3% (N = 38/92). Providers underestimated the number of opioids used for posterior spinal fusion, open pectus excavatum repair, open pectus carinatum repair, knee arthroscopy, and tonsillectomy and overestimated opioid use following hip reconstruction. Differences in median postoperative opioid use estimates from providers versus adolescent-reported use were significant for knee arthroscopy (10 interquartile range [IQR, 0-3] versus 3 IQR [1.5-13]; P < 0.001) and tonsillectomy (0 IQR [0-2.5] versus 1 IQR [0-7]; P = 0.043). Overall, general pediatric surgery providers underestimated opioid use while orthopedic and cardiothoracic providers overestimated opioid use. Differences between provider specialty were significant for posterior spinal fusion (P = 0.022), knee arthroscopy (P < 0.001), and tonsillectomy (P = 0.005). The number of opioids prescribed varied by provider role and 88.9% of providers (N = 32/36) reported that they would change prescribing habits based on adolescent reports.
There are differences in provider estimates of postoperative prescription opioid use versus adolescent-reported use. Fortunately, providers report a willingness to change prescribing practice based on these differences. Feedback incorporating patient-reported postoperative opioid use may be a more accurate and patient-centered way to decrease excess opioid prescribing.
大多数青少年报告术后有未使用的阿片类药物。目前的干预措施是比较外科医生之间的阿片类药物处方情况,而没有获取患者实际报告的使用情况。
我们从一家三级医疗儿童医院的四个外科科室招募了儿科手术住院医师、研究员、高级执业医师和外科医生。提供者根据我们机构青少年报告的术后阿片类药物使用数据审查临床病例。之后,要求提供者选择他们会开出的阿片类药物丸数,并将他们的回答与青少年报告的使用情况进行比较。然后,我们根据这种比较来衡量提供者改变处方习惯的意愿。
总体而言,提供者的回应率为41.3%(N = 38/92)。提供者低估了用于后路脊柱融合术、开放性漏斗胸修复术、开放性鸡胸修复术、膝关节镜检查和扁桃体切除术的阿片类药物数量,而高估了髋关节重建术后的阿片类药物使用量。提供者估计的术后阿片类药物使用中位数与青少年报告的使用情况之间的差异在膝关节镜检查(10四分位间距[IQR,0 - 3]对3 IQR[1.5 - 13];P < 0.001)和扁桃体切除术(0 IQR[0 - 2.5]对1 IQR[0 - 7];P = 0.043)方面具有统计学意义。总体而言,普通儿科手术提供者低估了阿片类药物的使用,而骨科和心胸科提供者高估了阿片类药物的使用。提供者专业之间的差异在脊柱后路融合术(P = 0.022)、膝关节镜检查(P < 0.001)和扁桃体切除术(P = 0.005)方面具有统计学意义。开出的阿片类药物数量因提供者角色而异,88.9%的提供者(N = 32/36)报告他们会根据青少年的报告改变处方习惯。
提供者对术后处方阿片类药物使用的估计与青少年报告的使用情况存在差异。幸运的是,提供者报告愿意根据这些差异改变处方习惯。纳入患者报告的术后阿片类药物使用情况的反馈可能是减少阿片类药物过度处方的一种更准确且以患者为中心的方法。