Deane Adam M, Lauzier François, Adhikari Neill K J, Lamontagne François, Heels-Ansdell Diane, Thabane Lehana, Williamson David, Kanji Salmaan, Barletta Jeffrey F, Finfer Simon, Arabi Yaseen, Ostermann Marlies, Marshall John C, Zytaruk Nicole L, Hardie Miranda, Hammond Naomi E, Guyatt Gordon, White Kyle C, Burns Karen E A, Dionne Joanna C, Young Paul J, Cook Deborah J
Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Département de médecine et Département d'anesthésiologie et de soins intensifs, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Sep;211(9):1671-1680. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202411-2245OC.
Patient-important gastrointestinal bleeding is an endpoint developed by patients and family members; however, risk factors for this outcome are unknown. We sought to identify risk factors for patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding among invasively ventilated adults. This preplanned regression analysis of an international trial database evaluated baseline and time-varying risk factors in the preceding 3 days for patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, accounting for illness severity and the competing risk of death. Patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in the ICU among 131 of 4,821 (2.7%) patients. Baseline APACHE II score-hazard ratio (HR), 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12, 1.37) per 5-point increase-and the following were associated with greater risk of patient-important bleeding: inotropes or vasopressors (HR, 2.05 [95% CI = 1.35, 3.12]), severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count, <50 × 10/L) (HR, 2.21 [95% CI = 1.24, 3.94]) and platelet inhibitor drugs (HR, 1.69 [95% CI = 1.11, 2.56]). A lower bleeding risk was associated with pantoprazole (HR, 0.36 [95% CI = 0.25, 0.54]) and enteral nutrition (HR, 0.81 [95% CI = 0.68, 0.97]) for every increase of 500 ml/d. There was no interaction between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole (interaction = 0.94). Allocation to pantoprazole was associated with a lower risk of patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding regardless of the volume of enteral nutrition (for 500 ml/d: HR, 0.36 [95% CI = 0.22, 0.58]; for no enteral nutrition: HR, 0.36 [95% CI = 0.18, 0.72]). The association of enteral nutrition and bleeding was similar with pantoprazole (HR, 0.82 [95% CI = 0.63, 1.07]) or without pantoprazole (HR, 0.81 [95% CI = 0.66, 1.00]). Several factors are associated with the risk of patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding during invasive ventilation.
患者重要的胃肠道出血是由患者及其家属提出的一个终点指标;然而,这一结果的危险因素尚不清楚。我们试图确定有创通气成年患者中患者重要的上消化道出血的危险因素。这项对国际试验数据库进行的预先计划的回归分析评估了前3天患者重要的上消化道出血的基线和随时间变化的危险因素,同时考虑了疾病严重程度和死亡这一竞争风险。在4821例患者中,有131例(2.7%)在重症监护病房发生了患者重要的上消化道出血。基线急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分每增加5分,风险比(HR)为1.24(95%置信区间[CI]=1.12, 1.37),以下因素与患者重要出血的风险增加相关:使用血管活性药物(HR,2.05[95%CI=1.35, 3.12])、严重血小板减少(血小板计数<50×10/L)(HR,2.21[95%CI=1.24, 3.94])和血小板抑制剂药物(HR,1.69[95%CI=1.11, 2.56])。泮托拉唑(HR,0.36[95%CI=0.25, 0.54])和肠内营养每增加500ml/d(HR,0.81[95%CI=0.68, 0.97])与较低的出血风险相关。肠内营养和泮托拉唑之间没有相互作用(相互作用=0.94)。无论肠内营养的量如何,使用泮托拉唑都与患者重要的上消化道出血风险较低相关(对于500ml/d:HR,0.36[95%CI=0.22, 0.58];对于无肠内营养:HR,0.36[95%CI=0.18, 0.72])。肠内营养与出血的关联在使用泮托拉唑(HR,0.82[95%CI=0.63, 1.07])或未使用泮托拉唑(HR,0.81[95%CI=0.66, 1.00])时相似。有几个因素与有创通气期间患者重要的上消化道出血风险相关。