Suppr超能文献

与健康人相比,接受丁丙诺啡和美沙酮治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者的记忆功能。

Memory function in patients with opioid dependence treated with buprenorphine and methadone in comparison with healthy persons.

作者信息

Ardakani Sara Kamali, Mahmoudi Sara, Rahmani Khaled, Shamsalizadeh Narges

机构信息

Neurosciences Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.

Department of Student Research, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02832-z.

Abstract

Methadone and buprenorphine are commonly used for drug abuse treatment but may impair cognitive function. This study assessed memory performance in patients receiving these treatments compared to healthy controls. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 93 buprenorphine- and 120 methadone-treated patients, compared with 120 healthy controls. The Wechsler Memory Scale was used, and scores were compared among the study groups using Kruskal-Wallis with Tukey's post-hoc test. Maintenance therapy duration was compared between case groups using an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Healthy controls were superior to both treatment groups in mental control. The methadone group surpassed controls in personal and general information (P < 0.05), while buprenorphine-treated patients scored lower in associate learning. Patients receiving methadone for > 2 years had a higher mean score of awareness of place and time than those on long-term buprenorphine (P = 0.034). Longer buprenorphine treatment correlated with improved total memory scores (P = 0.03). The mental test showed no significant adverse effect for either medication on most mental aspects, except for mental control, which was worse than the control group in both medications. In some aspects, treated patients even outperformed controls. Buprenorphine preserves memory function better than methadone over time.

摘要

美沙酮和丁丙诺啡常用于药物滥用治疗,但可能损害认知功能。本研究评估了接受这些治疗的患者与健康对照者的记忆表现。对93名接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者和120名接受美沙酮治疗的患者进行了横断面研究,并与120名健康对照者进行比较。使用韦氏记忆量表,并通过Kruskal-Wallis检验和Tukey事后检验比较研究组之间的得分。使用独立t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验比较病例组之间的维持治疗持续时间。健康对照者在心理控制方面优于两个治疗组。美沙酮组在个人和一般信息方面超过了对照组(P < 0.05),而接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者在联想学习方面得分较低。接受美沙酮治疗超过2年的患者在地点和时间定向意识方面的平均得分高于长期接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者(P = 0.034)。丁丙诺啡治疗时间越长,总记忆得分越高(P = 0.03)。心理测试表明,除心理控制外,两种药物对大多数心理方面均无显著不良影响,两种药物的心理控制均比对照组差。在某些方面,接受治疗的患者甚至表现优于对照组。随着时间的推移,丁丙诺啡比美沙酮更能保护记忆功能。

相似文献

7
Mortality risk of opioid substitution therapy with methadone versus buprenorphine: a retrospective cohort study.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;2(10):901-8. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00366-1. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Prenatal exposure to methadone or buprenorphine impairs cognitive performance in young adult rats.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:108008. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108008. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
9
Sexual Dysfunction in Heroin Dependents: A Comparison between Methadone and Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147852. eCollection 2016.
10
Constipation and other common symptoms reported by women and men in methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Dec 1;181:132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Methadone for Chronic Pain: A Review of Pharmacology, Efficacy, and Safety Concerns.
Health Psychol Res. 2025 Mar 2;13:129552. doi: 10.52965/001c.129552. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding the Mechanisms of Action and Effects of Drugs of Abuse.
Molecules. 2023 Jun 24;28(13):4969. doi: 10.3390/molecules28134969.
9
Global patterns of opioid use and dependence: harms to populations, interventions, and future action.
Lancet. 2019 Oct 26;394(10208):1560-1579. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32229-9. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
10
Buprenorphine Pharmacology Review: Update on Transmucosal and Long-acting Formulations.
J Addict Med. 2019 Mar/Apr;13(2):93-103. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000457.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验