Suppr超能文献

从埃塞俄比亚临床标本中分离出的表型耐药谱以及多重耐药假单胞菌和不动杆菌属的流行情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Prevalence of phenotypic drug resistance profiles and multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species recovered from clinical specimens in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tilahun Mihret, Gedefie Alemu, Seid Abdurahaman, Debash Habtu, Shibabaw Agumas

机构信息

Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, P.O. Box 1145, Dessie, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 23;25(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11136-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial-resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species are emerging as serious public health risks, both globally and in resource-limited countries such as Ethiopia. These microorganisms cause serious, life-threatening infections and are becoming increasingly resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics. The high prevalence and resistance patterns of these bacteria need immediate action to inform treatment guidelines, increase infection control measure, and develop effective public health policies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of phenotypic drug resistance profiles and multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species recovered from clinical specimens in Ethiopia.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis, which followed PRISMA principles, analyzed data from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar to determine the prevalence and antibiotic resistance trends of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species in Ethiopia. Eligible studies were extracted by using Microsoft Excel and exported to STATA version 17 for analysis. The pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was examined using the I statistic. Publication bias was investigated using funnel plot analysis and Egger's test, and sensitivity analysis was used to assess the impact of individual studies on the total pooled findings.

RESULT

Of the 1,375 studies identified, 187 were eligible for qualitative analysis, leading to the inclusion of 65 studies in the meta-analysis. This analysis encompassed a total of 1,264 isolates, with 364 identified as Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species. The systematic review revealed a pooled prevalence of 19.12% (95% CI: 14.86-23.38) for Pseudomonas species and 12.46% (95% CI: 5.82-19.10) for Acinetobacter species. The combined prevalence of both pathogens was 25.31 (95% CI: 18.61-32.00) with substantial heterogeneity (I = 93.6%, p < 0.001). across the studies. Pseudomonas exhibited high resistance rates to amoxicillin-clavulanic Acid (83.73%) and tetracycline (89.15%), while Acinetobacter showed 87.21% resistance to tetracycline and 79.72% to ceftriaxone. The overall pooled prevalence of MDR Pseudomonas species was 72.73% (95% CI: 67.02-78.44), and for Acinetobacter species, it reached 84.69% (95% CI: 78.78-90.59), respectively. Moreover, the pooled prevalence of MDR for both species isolated from clinical samples in Ethiopia was 74.79% (95% CI: 70.14-79.43), with significant heterogeneity (I = 99.7%, p < 0.001) across the studies.

CONCLUSION

The pooled prevalence of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species and their antibiotic resistance were alarmingly high in clinical samples in Ethiopia. These findings highlight the crucial need for more antimicrobial surveillance, stronger stewardship programs, and targeted research to combat the growing threat of resistance. Strategic public health policies are required to decrease these pathogens.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内以及在埃塞俄比亚等资源有限的国家,耐抗菌药物的假单胞菌属和不动杆菌属正成为严重的公共卫生风险。这些微生物会引发严重的、危及生命的感染,并且对常用抗生素的耐药性日益增强。这些细菌的高流行率和耐药模式需要立即采取行动,以指导治疗指南、加强感染控制措施并制定有效的公共卫生政策。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估从埃塞俄比亚临床标本中分离出的假单胞菌属和不动杆菌属的表型耐药谱及多重耐药菌的流行情况。

方法

本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA原则,分析了来自PubMed、Scopus和谷歌学术的数据,以确定埃塞俄比亚假单胞菌属和不动杆菌属的流行率及抗生素耐药趋势。使用Microsoft Excel提取符合条件的研究,并导出到STATA 17版本进行分析。采用随机效应模型估计合并流行率,使用I统计量检验异质性。通过漏斗图分析和Egger检验调查发表偏倚,并使用敏感性分析评估个体研究对总体合并结果的影响。

结果

在识别出的1375项研究中,187项符合定性分析条件,最终有65项研究纳入荟萃分析。该分析共涵盖1264株分离菌,其中364株被鉴定为假单胞菌属和不动杆菌属。系统评价显示,假单胞菌属的合并流行率为19.12%(95%置信区间:14.86 - 23.38),不动杆菌属的合并流行率为12.46%(95%置信区间:5.82 - 19.10)。两种病原体的合并流行率为25.31(95%置信区间:18.61 - 32.00),各研究间存在显著异质性(I = 93.6%,p < 0.001)。假单胞菌对阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸(83.73%)和四环素(89.15%)的耐药率较高,而不动杆菌对四环素的耐药率为87.21%,对头孢曲松的耐药率为79.72%。多重耐药假单胞菌属的总体合并流行率为72.73%(95%置信区间:67.02 - 78.44),不动杆菌属的为84.69%(95%置信区间:78.78 - 90.59)。此外,从埃塞俄比亚临床样本中分离出的两种菌的多重耐药合并流行率为74.79%(95%置信区间:70.14 - 79.43),各研究间存在显著异质性(I = 99.7%,p < 0.001)。

结论

在埃塞俄比亚的临床样本中,假单胞菌属和不动杆菌属的合并流行率及其抗生素耐药性高得惊人。这些发现凸显了加强抗菌监测、强化管理计划以及开展针对性研究以应对日益增长的耐药威胁的迫切需求。需要制定战略性公共卫生政策来减少这些病原体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c67/12103049/5f675d31f24d/12879_2025_11136_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验