Suppr超能文献

方案:信息与通信技术在乳腺癌身体活动干预中的应用:一项范围综述方案

PROTOCOL: The Application of Information and Communication Technologies in Physical Activity Interventions for Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review Protocol.

作者信息

Chen Xin, Imam Maaz, Yi Yutong, Pionke J J, Vega Lixcy, Arthur Anna, Chin Jessie, Chiu Chungyi

机构信息

Department of Dietetics and Nutrition University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas USA.

Carle Illinois College of Medicine Urbana Illinois USA.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 2;21(2):e70044. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70044. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

This is the protocol of a Campbell scoping review. This scoping review aims to identify and map the evidence regarding the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in physical activity (PA) interventions for breast cancer survivors (BCS), which includes examining the types of ICTs utilized, how they are applied, and their effects on BCS' PA-related outcomes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist (PRISMA-ScR) was used to structure this protocol. The focus of the scoping review is guided by the mnemonic PCC (Population, Concept, Context) recommended by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. PubMed, CINAHL (Ebsco), Web of Science (Clarivate), and SportDiscus (Ebsco) will be searched for peer-reviewed studies. We will include interventional studies using ICTs for PA promotion among BCS across the cancer care continuum. Our protocol incorporates information about the aims and importance of the scoping review, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data synthesis. The total number and key characteristics of included studies will be reported in this scoping review. It will identify and map the current ICTs used in PA interventions, outline the methods and extent of their application, and summarize the related outcomes observed among BCS. Participation in PA remains insufficient among BCS despite its known benefits in lowering the risk of death and improving breast cancer prognosis. While technology-based interventions have received increased attention in recent years, there is still limited consensus within the scientific literature surrounding ICT-based PA interventions for BCS. The use of ICTs in PA interventions may promote PA among BCS and benefit their survivorship. This scoping review may lead to strategies for developing ICTs that are optimal to be used in PA interventions that benefit BCS, a large and growing population of cancer survivors. Additionally, it will identify knowledge gaps to enhance healthcare communication between healthcare practitioners and BCS using ICTs, which may promote PA and lead to improved cancer survivorship in this population. Registered and available at OSF (https://osf.io/hwde4/?view_only=be6ef619dc1a44b080bb61be32d5d56f).

摘要

这是一项坎贝尔范围综述的方案。该范围综述旨在识别和梳理关于信息通信技术(ICTs)在乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)身体活动(PA)干预中应用的证据,包括考察所使用的ICTs类型、其应用方式以及它们对BCS与PA相关结局的影响。本方案采用了系统评价与Meta分析扩展版范围综述清单(PRISMA - ScR)来构建。范围综述的重点遵循循证卫生保健国际中心(JBI)证据综合手册推荐的助记符PCC(人群、概念、背景)。将在PubMed、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL,Ebsco平台)、科学引文索引(Web of Science,科睿唯安)以及体育文献数据库(SportDiscus,Ebsco平台)中检索同行评议研究。我们将纳入在整个癌症护理连续过程中使用ICTs促进BCS进行PA的干预性研究。我们的方案包含了关于范围综述的目的和重要性、检索策略、纳入/排除标准、研究选择、数据提取、质量评估以及数据综合的信息。本范围综述将报告纳入研究的总数和关键特征。它将识别和梳理PA干预中目前使用的ICTs,概述其应用方法和程度,并总结在BCS中观察到的相关结局。尽管已知PA对降低死亡风险和改善乳腺癌预后有益,但BCS参与PA的情况仍然不足。虽然近年来基于技术的干预受到了更多关注,但围绕基于ICTs的BCS PA干预,科学文献中仍存在有限的共识。在PA干预中使用ICTs可能会促进BCS的PA并使其生存受益。本范围综述可能会产生开发在有益于BCS(这一庞大且不断增长的癌症幸存者群体)的PA干预中最适用的ICTs的策略。此外,它将识别知识差距,以加强医护人员与BCS之间使用ICTs的医疗保健沟通,这可能会促进PA并改善该人群的癌症生存情况。已在开放科学框架(OSF,https://osf.io/hwde4/?view_only=be6ef619dc1a44b080bb61be32d5d56f)注册并可获取。

相似文献

7
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical activity and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.
Breast Dis. 2024;43(1):161-171. doi: 10.3233/BD-249005.
2
Cancer statistics, 2023.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
3
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Sep;72(5):409-436. doi: 10.3322/caac.21731. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
4
Differentiating between mapping reviews and scoping reviews in the evidence synthesis ecosystem.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;149:175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 27.
5
Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern.
Br J Radiol. 2022 Feb 1;95(1130):20211033. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211033. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
6
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application.
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;10(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3.
9
Opportunities and challenges for contactless healthcare services in the post-COVID-19 Era.
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Jun;167:120712. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120712. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验