Suppr超能文献

与脊髓性肌萎缩症患者及其照料者相关的患者报告结局的初步心理测量学验证。

Preliminary psychometric validation of patient-reported outcomes relevant to individuals with spinal muscular atrophy and their caregivers.

作者信息

Cattinari Maria Grazia, Pascual-Pascual Samuel Ignacio, de Lemus Mencía, Medina Julita, Dumont María, Rebollo Pablo, Vázquez-Costa Juan Francisco

机构信息

Fundacion Atrofia Muscular Espinal España (FundAME), Calle Nuria 93, 1ºC, Madrid, 28034, Spain.

Hospital Universitario La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 261, Madrid, 28046, Spain.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jun 4;20(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03832-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need to expand the current scope of assessment tools usually applied to patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties (reliability and discriminant validity) of a set of new patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) called PROfuture, after analysing the performance of individual items of the questionnaires.

RESULTS

Patients included in the Spanish SMA Patient-Reported Registry (RegistrAME) were invited to answer 10 questionnaires: Fatigability; Pain; Scoliosis and Contractures (S&C); Feeding (F); Breathing and Voice (B&V); Sleep and Rest (S&R); Vulnerability; Infections and Hospitalisations (I&H); Time spent in care (T); and Mobility and Independence (M&I). The diagnosis date, type of SMA, functional classification, and comorbidities were also collected. A total of 160 patients of the 330 included in RegistrAME participated in the study: mean age (SD) 18 (16.6) years, 27.5% non-sitter, 46.88% sitter, and 25.63% walker, 20.0% type 1 SMA, 51.88% type 2, and 28.12% type 3. The frequency of symptoms varied from 43.5% of patients reporting some degree of Pain to 96.3% reporting some degree of Fatigability. The reliability assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient was > 0.75 for all the PROs and > 0.9 for S&C, F, B&V, T, and M&I. Regarding content validity, scores were higher (worse health status) in type 1 SMA patients than in types 2 and 3, and were also higher for non-sitter patients than for sitter and walker patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ten questionnaires included in the PROfuture set were developed based on what people living with spinal muscular atrophy and their caregivers consider relevant. This preliminary study provides an initial basis to consider their potential usefulness in assessing aspects that matter to this population. The early findings are promising, however, further extensive psychometric evaluation is needed. PROfuture is a new set of patient-reported outcome measures, specifically designed by and for individuals living with spinal muscular atrophy and their caregivers. Future studies will help strengthen the evidence regarding its reliability and validity.

摘要

背景

有必要扩大目前通常应用于脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)患者的评估工具范围。本研究旨在通过分析问卷中各个条目的表现,评估一组名为PROfuture的新的患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的心理测量特性(可靠性和区分效度)。

结果

邀请纳入西班牙SMA患者报告登记处(RegistrAME)的患者回答10份问卷:疲劳感;疼痛;脊柱侧弯和挛缩(S&C);进食(F);呼吸和发声(B&V);睡眠和休息(S&R);易损性;感染和住院(I&H);接受护理的时间(T);以及活动能力和独立性(M&I)。还收集了诊断日期、SMA类型、功能分级和合并症。RegistrAME纳入的330名患者中共有160名参与了研究:平均年龄(标准差)18(16.6)岁,27.5%为不能独坐者,4,6.88%为能独坐者,25.63%为能行走者,20.0%为1型SMA,51.88%为2型,28.12%为3型。症状出现的频率各不相同,从43.5%的患者报告有某种程度的疼痛到96.3%的患者报告有某种程度的疲劳感。通过克朗巴哈α系数评估的所有PROs的可靠性均>0.75,S&C、F、B&V、T和M&I的可靠性>0.9。关于内容效度,1型SMA患者的得分高于2型和3型患者(健康状况更差),不能独坐的患者得分也高于能独坐和能行走的患者。

结论

PROfuture系列中的十份问卷是根据脊髓性肌萎缩症患者及其护理人员认为相关的内容制定的。这项初步研究为考虑它们在评估对该人群重要的方面的潜在用途提供了初步依据。早期研究结果很有前景,然而,还需要进一步进行广泛的心理测量评估。PROfuture是一组新的患者报告结局指标,专门为由脊髓性肌萎缩症患者及其护理人员设计并供他们使用。未来的研究将有助于加强关于其可靠性和有效性的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a70e/12135442/10f2801fa1bc/13023_2025_3832_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验