Kawasaki Atsuko, Yuki Miho, Nakagawa Shizuka, Iwasaki Keisuke, Ochi Haruka, Sugitani Yasuo
Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Speciality Clinical Development Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 May 31;19:1639-1652. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S513165. eCollection 2025.
Patient preference is important in decision-making processes, such as drug approval and price determination. We conducted a systematic review regarding the preference of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treatment.
We searched for articles on patient preferences for AMD treatment published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2023 using EMBASE, Google scholar, MEDLINE, and PLOS.
Seven studies were included in this systematic review. Conjoint analysis was used in all seven trials, of which six were Discrete Choice Experiments and one was a ranking. These studies were conducted in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain, and Singapore. Six studies focused on patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD, also called wet AMD, ie, wAMD), and one focused on patients with nAMD or diabetic macular edema. The attributes of the treatments used in these seven studies were efficacy, safety, convenience, and cost. Overall, the relative importance of attributes related to efficacy and safety were the highest, followed by those related to convenience and costs. The convenience and cost attributes were almost equal.
Although the definitions of treatment attributes differed among the studies, patients with nAMD considered efficacy and safety to be the most important. The results of several studies suggest that patient preferences may be affected by patient demographics, such as sex. Although there are currently only a few preference studies on patients with AMD, it is necessary to continue conducting studies to understand the trends in patient preferences according to patient demographics.
患者偏好对于决策过程很重要,例如药物审批和价格确定。我们针对年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)治疗的偏好进行了一项系统评价。
我们使用EMBASE、谷歌学术、MEDLINE和PLOS检索了2000年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间发表的关于患者对AMD治疗偏好的文章。
本系统评价纳入了七项研究。所有七项试验均采用联合分析,其中六项为离散选择实验,一项为排序法。这些研究在德国、美国、英国、日本、西班牙和新加坡进行。六项研究聚焦于新生血管性AMD(nAMD,也称为湿性AMD,即wAMD)患者,一项研究聚焦于nAMD或糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者。这七项研究中使用的治疗属性包括疗效、安全性、便利性和成本。总体而言,与疗效和安全性相关的属性的相对重要性最高,其次是与便利性和成本相关的属性。便利性和成本属性几乎相当。
尽管各研究中治疗属性的定义有所不同,但nAMD患者认为疗效和安全性最为重要。几项研究的结果表明,患者偏好可能会受到患者人口统计学特征(如性别)的影响。尽管目前关于AMD患者的偏好研究较少,但有必要继续开展研究以了解根据患者人口统计学特征的患者偏好趋势。