Suppr超能文献

TROP-2靶向抗体药物偶联物治疗既往接受过治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项对重建患者数据的系统评价和汇总分析

Efficacy and Safety of TROP-2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate Treatment in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Reconstructed Patient Data.

作者信息

Stumpo Sara, Carlini Andrea, Mantuano Francesco, Di Federico Alessandro, Melotti Barbara, Sperandi Francesca, Favorito Valentina, De Giglio Andrea

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via P. Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 23;17(11):1750. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111750.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy but is associated with modest clinical outcomes and considerable toxicity. Sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan are trophoblast cell surface antigen (TROP)-2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that showed encouraging activity in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. This systematic review and pooled analysis aims to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of anti-TROP-2 ADCs compared to docetaxel in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

A systematic search through PubMed and EMBASE before 31 January 2025 was performed to identify eligible studies. Randomized controlled phase III trials comparing an anti-TROP-2 regimen to docetaxel in patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were extracted from the identified trials. A pooled analysis of reconstructed patient data and meta-analysis employing the random-effect model were used to summarize the efficacy and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Across the two trials included, 1207 patients were enrolled, 598 in the TROP-2 ADC arm and 609 in the docetaxel arm. Anti-TROP-2 treatment did not produce significant improvements in OS (HR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78-1.03; P = 0.13) and PFS (HR: 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.02; P = 0.08), compared to docetaxel, even in patients with a nonsquamous histology (OS HR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01; P = 0.06; PFS HR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-1.12; P = 0.17). Across the subgroup analyses, a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed in patients with actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) (HR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; P = 0.03). Compared to docetaxel, the anti-TROP-2 regimen demonstrated a lower risk of developing grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (RR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.05; P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-TROP-2 regimen showed a better safety profile but failed to demonstrate a relevant clinical improvement over docetaxel. Anti-TROP-2 ADCs could find a role in the management of patients with AGAs.

摘要

背景

多西他赛是铂类化疗和/或免疫治疗后晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗药物,但临床疗效一般且毒性较大。戈沙妥珠单抗和德曲妥珠单抗是靶向滋养层细胞表面抗原(TROP)-2的抗体偶联药物(ADC),在既往接受过治疗的晚期NSCLC患者中显示出令人鼓舞的活性。本系统评价和汇总分析旨在全面评估与多西他赛相比,抗TROP-2 ADC在既往接受过治疗的晚期NSCLC患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在2025年1月31日前通过PubMed和EMBASE进行系统检索,以确定符合条件的研究。纳入比较抗TROP-2方案与多西他赛治疗既往接受过治疗的晚期NSCLC患者的随机对照III期试验。从纳入的试验中提取总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和≥3级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。采用汇总分析重建患者数据,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以总结疗效和安全性结果。

结果

在纳入的两项试验中,共入组1207例患者,抗TROP-2 ADC组598例,多西他赛组609例。与多西他赛相比,抗TROP-2治疗在OS(风险比[HR]:0.90;95%置信区间[CI],0.78-1.03;P=0.13)和PFS(HR:0.84;95%CI,0.68-1.02;P=0.08)方面未产生显著改善,即使在非鳞状组织学患者中也是如此(OS HR:0.86;95%CI,0.73-1.01;P=0.06;PFS HR:0.76;95%CI,0.52-1.12;P=0.17)。在亚组分析中,可操作基因组改变(AGA)患者的OS有统计学显著改善(HR:0.63;95%CI,0.41-0.95;P=0.03)。与多西他赛相比,抗TROP-2方案发生≥3级TRAEs的风险较低(相对风险[RR]:0.76;95%CI,0.55-1.05;P=0.09)。

结论

抗TROP-2方案安全性更好,但未显示出比多西他赛有相关临床改善。抗TROP-2 ADC可能在AGA患者的治疗中发挥作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5638/12153610/ea013320d270/cancers-17-01750-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验