Stumpo Sara, Carlini Andrea, Mantuano Francesco, Di Federico Alessandro, Melotti Barbara, Sperandi Francesca, Favorito Valentina, De Giglio Andrea
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via P. Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 23;17(11):1750. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111750.
Docetaxel is the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy but is associated with modest clinical outcomes and considerable toxicity. Sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan are trophoblast cell surface antigen (TROP)-2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that showed encouraging activity in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. This systematic review and pooled analysis aims to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of anti-TROP-2 ADCs compared to docetaxel in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC.
A systematic search through PubMed and EMBASE before 31 January 2025 was performed to identify eligible studies. Randomized controlled phase III trials comparing an anti-TROP-2 regimen to docetaxel in patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were extracted from the identified trials. A pooled analysis of reconstructed patient data and meta-analysis employing the random-effect model were used to summarize the efficacy and safety outcomes.
Across the two trials included, 1207 patients were enrolled, 598 in the TROP-2 ADC arm and 609 in the docetaxel arm. Anti-TROP-2 treatment did not produce significant improvements in OS (HR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78-1.03; P = 0.13) and PFS (HR: 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.02; P = 0.08), compared to docetaxel, even in patients with a nonsquamous histology (OS HR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01; P = 0.06; PFS HR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-1.12; P = 0.17). Across the subgroup analyses, a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed in patients with actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) (HR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; P = 0.03). Compared to docetaxel, the anti-TROP-2 regimen demonstrated a lower risk of developing grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (RR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.05; P = 0.09).
The anti-TROP-2 regimen showed a better safety profile but failed to demonstrate a relevant clinical improvement over docetaxel. Anti-TROP-2 ADCs could find a role in the management of patients with AGAs.
多西他赛是铂类化疗和/或免疫治疗后晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗药物,但临床疗效一般且毒性较大。戈沙妥珠单抗和德曲妥珠单抗是靶向滋养层细胞表面抗原(TROP)-2的抗体偶联药物(ADC),在既往接受过治疗的晚期NSCLC患者中显示出令人鼓舞的活性。本系统评价和汇总分析旨在全面评估与多西他赛相比,抗TROP-2 ADC在既往接受过治疗的晚期NSCLC患者中的疗效和安全性。
在2025年1月31日前通过PubMed和EMBASE进行系统检索,以确定符合条件的研究。纳入比较抗TROP-2方案与多西他赛治疗既往接受过治疗的晚期NSCLC患者的随机对照III期试验。从纳入的试验中提取总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和≥3级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。采用汇总分析重建患者数据,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以总结疗效和安全性结果。
在纳入的两项试验中,共入组1207例患者,抗TROP-2 ADC组598例,多西他赛组609例。与多西他赛相比,抗TROP-2治疗在OS(风险比[HR]:0.90;95%置信区间[CI],0.78-1.03;P=0.13)和PFS(HR:0.84;95%CI,0.68-1.02;P=0.08)方面未产生显著改善,即使在非鳞状组织学患者中也是如此(OS HR:0.86;95%CI,0.73-1.01;P=0.06;PFS HR:0.76;95%CI,0.52-1.12;P=0.17)。在亚组分析中,可操作基因组改变(AGA)患者的OS有统计学显著改善(HR:0.63;95%CI,0.41-0.95;P=0.03)。与多西他赛相比,抗TROP-2方案发生≥3级TRAEs的风险较低(相对风险[RR]:0.76;95%CI,0.55-1.05;P=0.09)。
抗TROP-2方案安全性更好,但未显示出比多西他赛有相关临床改善。抗TROP-2 ADC可能在AGA患者的治疗中发挥作用。