Lüftner Diana, Banys-Paluchowski Maggie, Hartkopf Andreas D, Hörner Manuel, Janni Wolfgang, Langanke Dagmar, Müller Volkmar, Schneeweiss Andreas, Schmidt Marcus, Thill Marc, Untch Michael, Wöckel Achim, Höllrich Lukas, Kreuzeder Julia, Marx Almuth, Meinzinger Julia, Regus-Leidig Hanna, Roos Christian, Wohlgemuth Hien, Sussmann Stephanie, Fasching Peter A
Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany.
Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2025 Apr 4;85(6):599-610. doi: 10.1055/a-2561-6640. eCollection 2025 Jun.
This study provides an indirect treatment comparison of ribociclib combined with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors and ovarian function suppression (ribociclib + NSAI + OFS) vs. a frequently used treatment option in German clinical routine (tamoxifen ± OFS) in premenopausal patients with HR-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer (BC).
Data on premenopausal women treated with ribociclib and tamoxifen were derived from the NATALEE clinical trial (NCT03701334) and the retrospective German data collection CLEAR-B, respectively. NATALEE trial eligibility criteria were applied to the CLEAR-B dataset. Standardized mortality ratio weights were used for propensity score (PS) adjustment to balance study populations. All hazard ratios (HR) were calculated based on a 4-year-observation period for both treatment arms. Effectiveness endpoints comprised invasive and distant disease-free survival (iDFS, dDFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety-related endpoints were treatment termination (TT) and toxicity-related TT (TTtox). For safety comparisons, the ribociclib arm was divided into groups that discontinued ribociclib + NSAI + OFS or ribociclib only.
Significant beneficial effects favoring ribociclib + NSAI + OFS (n = 1115) over tamoxifen ± OFS (n = 822) were observed for all effectiveness outcomes (iDFS [HR = 0.5 (95% CI 0.35; 0.71); p < 0.01]; dDFS [HR = 0.52 (95% CI 0.35; 0.77); p = 0.01], RFS [HR = 0.42 (95% CI 0.29; 0.62); p < 0.01], OS [HR = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18; 0.63); p = 0.01]) during the 4-year-observation period. The effect of early treatment discontinuation showed no significant differences between ribociclib + NSAI + OFS and tamoxifen ± OFS (TT-a: HR = 1.2 [95% CI: 0.71; 2.01], p = 0.48; TTtox-a: HR = 0.54 [95% CI 0.22; 1.30], p = 0.23).
In this retrospective analysis, ribociclib + NSAI + OFS demonstrated advantages across all effectiveness endpoints, including OS, in premenopausal women with HR+, HER2- early BC, without increasing overall treatment discontinuation rates compared to tamoxifen ± OFS.
本研究对瑞博西尼联合非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂及卵巢功能抑制(瑞博西尼+非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂+卵巢功能抑制)与德国临床常规中常用的治疗方案(他莫昔芬±卵巢功能抑制)在激素受体阳性(HR+)、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)的绝经前早期乳腺癌(BC)患者中的疗效进行了间接治疗比较。
接受瑞博西尼和他莫昔芬治疗的绝经前女性数据分别来自NATALEE临床试验(NCT03701334)和德国回顾性数据收集CLEAR-B。将NATALEE试验的纳入标准应用于CLEAR-B数据集。采用标准化死亡比权重进行倾向评分(PS)调整,以平衡研究人群。两个治疗组的所有风险比(HR)均基于4年观察期计算。有效性终点包括侵袭性无病生存期和远处无病生存期(iDFS、dDFS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。安全性相关终点为治疗终止(TT)和毒性相关治疗终止(TTtox)。为进行安全性比较,将瑞博西尼组分为停用瑞博西尼+非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂+卵巢功能抑制或仅停用瑞博西尼的亚组。
在4年观察期内,所有有效性结局(iDFS[HR = 0.5(95%CI 0.35;0.71);p < 0.01];dDFS[HR = 0.52(95%CI 0.35;0.77);p = 0.01],RFS[HR = 0.42(95%CI 0.29;0.62);p < 0.01],OS[HR = 0.34(95%CI 0.18;0.63);p = 0.01])均显示瑞博西尼+非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂+卵巢功能抑制组(n = 1115)优于他莫昔芬±卵巢功能抑制组(n = 822)。早期治疗中断的影响在瑞博西尼+非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂+卵巢功能抑制组和他莫昔芬±卵巢功能抑制组之间无显著差异(TT-a:HR = 1.2[95%CI:0.71;2.01],p = 0.48;TTtox-a:HR = 0.54[95%CI 0.22;1.30],p = 0.23)。
在此回顾性分析中,瑞博西尼+非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂+卵巢功能抑制在HR+、HER2-的绝经前早期乳腺癌女性的所有有效性终点(包括OS)方面均显示出优势,与他莫昔芬±卵巢功能抑制相比,并未增加总体治疗中断率。