Brown Ryan L, Hery Chloe M Beverly, Prather Aric A, Christian Lisa M
Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.
Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0323489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323489. eCollection 2025.
Despite the importance of sleep for perinatal health, there is limited research examining whether different measurement modalities may yield inconsistent data from pregnancy through postpartum. We aimed to: 1) describe how sleep patterns change across pregnancy and postpartum using self-report PSQI and actigraphy measures and 2) determine the level of correspondence between these two measurement modalities. Pregnant women from the Stress and Health in Pregnancy and Postpartum (SHIPP) study completed visits during the 3rd trimester, 4-6 weeks postpartum, and 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months postpartum. At each study visit, participants completed questionnaires and wore wrist-actigraphy (Actiwatch 2) for one week prior to each visit. Self-reported global sleep quality was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Actigraphy and self-reported PSQI sleep characteristics were summarized at each of the five study visits. Using generalized linear mixed modeling, we examined if there were differences by sleep measurement (actigraphy vs. PSQI) for the overlapping sleep outcomes: total sleep time, time in bed, sleep latency, and sleep efficiency. Participants (n = 74; 28.9 years ± 4.6) were mostly white (73%), non-Hispanic (96%), married (78.5%) and over 60% had at least one child previously. Average PSQI global score was > 5 (cutoff for poor sleep) at each study visit. Total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and sleep latency measurements were significantly different between self-report and actigraphy throughout pregnancy and postpartum. Actigraphy-assessed sleep may reflect longer total sleep times, shorter sleep latency, and greater sleep efficiency compared to self-reported sleep among pregnant and postpartum women. This may be due to measurement error in actigraphy or recall bias when completing self-reported sleep measures. These factors should be taken into consideration both at the time of study design and when comparing results from different studies to facilitate the highest quality research and clinical decision-making in this population.
尽管睡眠对围产期健康至关重要,但对于不同测量方式从孕期到产后是否会产生不一致的数据,相关研究有限。我们旨在:1)使用自我报告的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和活动记录仪测量方法,描述孕期和产后睡眠模式如何变化;2)确定这两种测量方式之间的对应程度。来自孕期及产后压力与健康(SHIPP)研究的孕妇在孕晚期、产后4 - 6周、产后4个月、8个月和12个月时完成访视。在每次研究访视时,参与者在访视前一周完成问卷并佩戴腕部活动记录仪(Actiwatch 2)。使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)测量自我报告的整体睡眠质量。在五次研究访视中的每一次,总结活动记录仪和自我报告的PSQI睡眠特征。使用广义线性混合模型,我们检查了在重叠的睡眠结果(总睡眠时间、卧床时间、睡眠潜伏期和睡眠效率)方面,睡眠测量方式(活动记录仪与PSQI)是否存在差异。参与者(n = 74;28.9岁±4.6)大多为白人(73%)、非西班牙裔(96%)、已婚(78.5%),超过60%的人之前至少有一个孩子。每次研究访视时,PSQI整体平均得分均>5(睡眠质量差的临界值)。在整个孕期和产后,自我报告和活动记录仪测量的总睡眠时间、睡眠效率和睡眠潜伏期存在显著差异。与孕妇和产后妇女自我报告的睡眠相比,活动记录仪评估的睡眠可能反映出更长的总睡眠时间、更短的睡眠潜伏期和更高的睡眠效率。这可能是由于活动记录仪的测量误差或完成自我报告睡眠测量时的回忆偏差。在研究设计时以及比较不同研究结果时,都应考虑这些因素,以促进该人群中最高质量的研究和临床决策。