Ahmad Sarah R, Levin Morris
Division of Headache Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Headache. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1111/head.14986.
To analyze adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) scores, headache frequency, and disability (six-item Headache Impact Test [HIT-6], Migraine Disability Assessment Scale [MIDAS]) in individuals with refractory chronic migraine (rCM) recommended for inpatient infusion therapy (IIT), compared to those with non-rCM and episodic migraine (EM).
Migraine is a highly disabling condition with genetic and environmental contributors, including ACEs. Prior studies have demonstrated an association between ACEs and CM. No studies to date have focused on the specific population of individuals with rCM recommended for IIT.
This was a cross-sectional, chart-review, single-institution study of patients with rCM recommended for IIT in 2023; the comparison non-rCM and EM groups were derived from all new patient encounters in 2023. We outlined criteria for refractoriness considering the number and class of preventives tried, with contributions from proposed definitions from the American Headache Society and European Headache Federation. The non-rCM and EM groups were derived from sorting by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision diagnosis. Data were collected from the New Patient Questionnaire, routinely administered to all new patients, and documentation in the electronic medical record. We examined ACE score, headache frequency, HIT-6 score, and MIDAS score for the three groups: rCM, non-rCM, and EM.
There were 68 patients in the rCM group, 101 in the non-rCM group, and 68 in the EM group. There was no statistically significant difference in the median ACE scores between the rCM (median [interquartile range, IQR] 2 [0-5]) and non-rCM (median [IQR] 1 [0-3]) groups (p = 0.230), but the comparison between the rCM and EM (median [IQR] 0 [0-2]) groups was significant (p = 0.013). The median headache frequency (reported in monthly headache days) was significantly higher in the rCM group (median [IQR] 30 [30-30]) compared to the non-rCM (median [IQR] 25 [18-30]) (p < 0.001) and EM (median [IQR] 8 [4-10], p < 0.001) groups. Finally, the rCM group had significantly higher median MIDAS (median [IQR] score 108 [49-161] vs. 36 [21-105], p < 0.001) and HIT-6 (median [IQR] score 67 [64-70] vs. 65 [62-68], p = 0.008) scores compared to those of the non-rCM group. All outcomes (ACE score, frequency, disability) were significantly higher for the rCM group versus the EM group.
In this first study to characterize ACE scores in those with rCM recommended for IIT, we found that the ACE score, headache frequency, MIDAS score, and HIT-6 score were significantly higher in the rCM group versus the EM group. Headache frequency, MIDAS score, and HIT-6 score were significantly higher in the rCM group versus the non-rCM group, but no significant difference was found for ACE scores between these two CM groups. Our results agree with prior research demonstrating an association of ACEs with migraine and its chronification. Further study is required to better understand how ACEs influence migraine and its refractoriness to treatment.
分析推荐接受住院输液治疗(IIT)的难治性慢性偏头痛(rCM)患者的童年不良经历(ACEs)得分、头痛频率和残疾程度(六项头痛影响测试 [HIT-6]、偏头痛残疾评估量表 [MIDAS]),并与非rCM和发作性偏头痛(EM)患者进行比较。
偏头痛是一种致残性很高的疾病,有遗传和环境因素,包括ACEs。先前的研究表明ACEs与慢性偏头痛之间存在关联。迄今为止,尚无研究关注推荐接受IIT的rCM患者这一特定人群。
这是一项横断面、病历回顾、单机构研究,研究对象为2023年推荐接受IIT的rCM患者;比较的非rCM和EM组来自2023年所有新患者就诊病例。我们根据尝试的预防药物数量和类别,结合美国头痛协会和欧洲头痛联盟提出的定义,概述了难治性的标准。非rCM和EM组通过国际疾病分类第十次修订版诊断进行分类。数据收集自常规发给所有新患者的新患者问卷以及电子病历中的记录。我们检查了三组患者的ACE得分、头痛频率、HIT-6得分和MIDAS得分:rCM组、非rCM组和EM组。
rCM组有68例患者,非rCM组有101例,EM组有68例。rCM组(中位数[四分位间距,IQR]2 [0 - 5])和非rCM组(中位数[IQR]1 [0 - 3])的ACE得分中位数无统计学显著差异(p = 0.230),但rCM组与EM组(中位数[IQR]0 [0 - 2])的比较有显著差异(p = 0.013)。rCM组的头痛频率中位数(以每月头痛天数报告)显著高于非rCM组(中位数[IQR]25 [18 - 30])(p < 0.001)和EM组(中位数[IQR]8 [4 - 10],p < 0.001)。最后,rCM组的MIDAS中位数(中位数[IQR]得分108 [49 - 161] 对比 36 [21 - 105],p < 0.001)和HIT-6中位数(中位数[IQR]得分67 [64 - 70] 对比 65 [62 - 68],p = 0.008)得分显著高于非rCM组。rCM组的所有结果(ACE得分、频率、残疾程度)均显著高于EM组。
在这项首次对推荐接受IIT的rCM患者的ACE得分进行特征描述的研究中,我们发现rCM组的ACE得分、头痛频率、MIDAS得分和HIT-6得分显著高于EM组。rCM组的头痛频率、MIDAS得分和HIT-6得分显著高于非rCM组,但这两个慢性偏头痛组之间的ACE得分无显著差异。我们的结果与先前研究一致,表明ACEs与偏头痛及其慢性化有关。需要进一步研究以更好地理解ACEs如何影响偏头痛及其难治性。