Hage Kris, Hamusonde Kalongo, van Santen Daniela K, Newsum Astrid M, van der Valk Marc, Brinkman Kees, Arends Joop E, Lauw Fanny N, Rijnders Bart J A, van Eeden Arne, Salazar-Viscaya Luisa, Schinkel Janke, Boyd Anders, Prins Maria
Department of Infectious Diseases Research and Prevention, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326094. eCollection 2025.
Certain key populations have a high risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection, which includes men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV who continue to engage in behaviors associated with HCV acquisition following clearance. Among MSM with HIV, we aimed to identify longitudinal sexual behavior patterns and estimate reinfection risk within identified patterns. MSM with HIV from the longitudinal, prospective Dutch MOSAIC study (2009-2018) at risk for HCV reinfection were included. Follow-up started following HCV clearance. Risk behavior was assessed using the HCV-MOSAIC score (range = 0.0-7.0), where ≥2 indicates high risk of reinfection. Classes were inferred from the mean HCV-MOSAIC score over time using a latent process mixed-effects model with the covariates age, group sex and casual partnership. The association between classes and HCV reinfection risk was assessed using a joint survival model. In total, 123 MSM were included with a median follow-up of 2.7 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 1.2-4.7]. Two classes were identified: one with mostly lower (C1, n = 67) and one with mostly higher risk behavior (C2, n = 56). During follow-up, both classes had considerable variation in HCV-MOSAIC scores (C1, median = 1.1, IQR = 0.0-2.1 and C2, median = 3.0, IQR = 2.0-3.5). HCV reinfection probability was similar between both classes at year 3 of follow-up [C1, 17%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 11%-35% and C2, 18%, 95%CI = 15%-47%], but became higher in C2 than C1 at year 5 (C1, 22%, 95%CI = 13%-39% and C2, 37%, 95%CI = 28%-69%). The variation in risk over time suggests that behavioral assessment is continually needed for early testing, treatment and offering behavioral inventions.
某些关键人群丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)再感染风险较高,其中包括感染了人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的男男性行为者(MSM),他们在病毒清除后仍继续从事与HCV感染相关的行为。在感染HIV的MSM中,我们旨在确定其纵向性行为模式,并估计在已确定模式中的再感染风险。研究纳入了荷兰一项纵向、前瞻性的MOSAIC研究(2009 - 2018年)中存在HCV再感染风险的感染HIV的MSM。随访在HCV清除后开始。使用HCV - MOSAIC评分(范围 = 0.0 - 7.0)评估风险行为,其中≥2表示再感染风险高。使用包含年龄、群体性别和偶然伴侣关系作为协变量的潜在过程混合效应模型,根据随时间变化的平均HCV - MOSAIC评分推断类别。使用联合生存模型评估类别与HCV再感染风险之间的关联。总共纳入了123名MSM,中位随访时间为2.7年[四分位间距(IQR)= 1.2 - 4.7]。确定了两类:一类主要是低风险行为(C1,n = 67),另一类主要是高风险行为(C2,n = 56)。在随访期间,两类的HCV - MOSAIC评分都有相当大的变化(C1,中位数 = 1.1,IQR = 0.0 - 2.1;C2,中位数 = 3.0,IQR = 2.0 - 3.5)。随访第3年时,两类的HCV再感染概率相似[C1,17%,95%置信区间(CI)= 11% - 35%;C2,18%,95%CI = 15% - 47%],但在第5年时C2高于C1(C1,22%,95%CI = 13% - 39%;C2,37%,95%CI = 28% - 69%)。风险随时间的变化表明,为了进行早期检测、治疗和提供行为干预,持续进行行为评估是必要的。