Chau Phong K T, Schjølberg Tiril, Eriksen Mina Baarnes, Moe Anne-Mari Gjestvang, Graff Pål, Haugen Fred
Division of Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), Pb 5330 Majorstuen 0304, Oslo, Norway.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2025 Jun 23;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12995-025-00469-2.
This study aimed to investigate the impact of occupational thermal exposure on shift workers, specifically whether cold exposure elicits distinct physiological responses and thermoregulatory recovery across different tasks and shift types.
Observational study at two factories processing prawns in Northern Norway in which 32 shift-working seafood handlers with different task responsibilities were followed for a single shift (morning, evening, night). The participants answered questionnaires regarding thermal exposures at work and related symptoms; these were compared to answers from 12 administration workers. Personal thermal loggers measured the range of temperature exposures associated with four different seafood handler work tasks. Pre- and post-shift plasma levels of FGF21, GDF15 and cytokines were analysed using immunoassays. As a proxy for thermoregulatory response across different shift types, hand temperature was measured repeatedly before and after breaks using a thermal imaging camera.
Most seafood handlers reported subjective impact from cold exposure. Cold working conditions of ≤ 10 ℃ were measured across all shifts and three different seafood handling tasks. The morning shift-seafood handlers displayed lower plasma FGF21 post-shift vs. pre-shift; the evening and night shifts showed no difference. GDF15 levels remained unchanged regardless of shift types but were positively correlated with age. Night shift was associated with increased plasma IL6 post-shift vs. pre-shift. Thermoregulatory responses showed a positive linear relationship with break duration but did not differ between shifts.
The findings suggest that exposure levels are closely linked to specific tasks and shifts, with thermoregulatory responses varying by task type and time of day.
本研究旨在调查职业热暴露对轮班工人的影响,特别是寒冷暴露是否会在不同任务和轮班类型中引发不同的生理反应和体温调节恢复情况。
在挪威北部两家加工对虾的工厂进行观察性研究,对32名承担不同工作职责的轮班海鲜处理工人进行了一个班次(早班、中班、夜班)的跟踪。参与者回答了关于工作时热暴露及相关症状的问卷;这些问卷答案与12名行政人员的答案进行了比较。个人热记录器测量了与四种不同海鲜处理工人工作任务相关的温度暴露范围。使用免疫测定法分析了轮班前和轮班后血浆中FGF21、GDF15和细胞因子的水平。作为不同轮班类型体温调节反应的替代指标,使用热成像相机在休息前后反复测量手部温度。
大多数海鲜处理工人报告了寒冷暴露带来的主观影响。在所有班次和三种不同的海鲜处理任务中都测量到了≤10℃的寒冷工作条件。早班海鲜处理工人轮班后血浆FGF21水平低于轮班前;中班和夜班则没有差异。无论轮班类型如何,GDF15水平均保持不变,但与年龄呈正相关。与轮班前相比,夜班工人轮班后血浆IL6水平升高。体温调节反应与休息时长呈正线性关系,但各轮班之间没有差异。
研究结果表明,暴露水平与特定任务和轮班密切相关,体温调节反应因任务类型和一天中的时间而异。