Kim Dayea, Cha Jaewoo
Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Republic of Korea.
Preventive Medicine, Korea University, Seongbuk-gu, Republic of Korea
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e098903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098903.
Angina, a major manifestation of ischaemic heart disease, affects 3-7% of adults and is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity. As an ambulatory care-sensitive condition, its outcomes can be improved through proactive outpatient management. However, the real-world impact of continuity of care (COC) and medication adherence, measured by the medication possession ratio (MPR)-on angina complications in South Korea remains poorly understood.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of COC and MPR in patients with angina using comprehensive national data and examined the outcomes at the hospital level.
This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea between 2002 and 2019. We identified 11 127 patients aged >30 years newly diagnosed with angina, applying strict exclusion criteria to ensure cohort validity. COC was categorised as high (COC index=1.0) or low (<1.0), and MPR was classified as excellent (≥80%), good (60%-79%) or poor (<60%). Complications, defined as the onset of coronary artery disease (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision: I20-I25), were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for key sociodemographic and clinical covariates.
Among the study cohort (mean age 63.4 years; 54.3% female), 64.2% had low COC. While patients with low COC had a 20% higher risk of complications compared with those with high COC (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.65; p=0.266), this was not statistically significant. Similarly, patients with poor MPR had a modestly elevated but non-significant risk (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.36). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly elevated complication risk in patients ≥80 years with low COC (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.67 to 2.32; p=0.04). The lowest complication rates were observed in patients receiving care from clinics with high COC and excellent MPR.
Higher levels of COC and MPR were associated with reduced angina-related complications, underscoring their importance in chronic disease management. However, the inconsistent statistical significance suggests disease-specific strategies may be needed to optimise continuity and adherence interventions. These findings have implications for refining ambulatory care models and enhancing chronic disease policies within Korea's single-payer system.
心绞痛是缺血性心脏病的主要表现形式,影响3%至7%的成年人,是心血管疾病发病的主要原因。作为一种门诊护理敏感型疾病,通过积极的门诊管理可以改善其治疗效果。然而,在韩国,以药物持有率(MPR)衡量的连续护理(COC)和药物依从性对心绞痛并发症的实际影响仍知之甚少。
本研究利用全国综合数据评估COC和MPR在心绞痛患者中的有效性,并在医院层面检查治疗效果。
这项回顾性队列研究使用了2002年至2019年韩国国民健康保险服务的数据。我们确定了11127名年龄超过30岁新诊断为心绞痛的患者,应用严格的排除标准以确保队列的有效性。COC分为高(COC指数 = 1.0)或低(<1.0),MPR分为优(≥80%)、良(60% - 79%)或差(<60%)。并发症定义为冠状动脉疾病的发作(国际疾病分类,第10版:I20 - I25),使用Kaplan - Meier生存曲线和Cox比例风险模型进行分析,并对关键的社会人口统计学和临床协变量进行调整。
在研究队列(平均年龄63.4岁;54.3%为女性)中,64.2%的患者COC较低。虽然COC低的患者并发症风险比COC高的患者高20%(HR:1.20;95%CI:0.87至1.65;p = 0.266),但这在统计学上并不显著。同样,MPR差的患者风险略有升高但不显著(HR:0.96;95%CI:0.67至1.36)。亚组分析显示,80岁及以上且COC低的患者并发症风险显著升高(HR:2.00;95%CI:1.67至2.32;p = 0.04)。在接受COC高且MPR优的诊所护理的患者中观察到最低的并发症发生率。
更高水平的COC和MPR与心绞痛相关并发症的减少有关,突出了它们在慢性病管理中的重要性。然而,统计显著性不一致表明可能需要针对特定疾病的策略来优化连续性和依从性干预措施。这些发现对完善韩国单一支付系统内的门诊护理模式和加强慢性病政策具有启示意义。