Paul Repon C, Venetis Christos A, Fitzgerald Oisin, Chambers Georgina M
National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU), Centre for Big Data Research in Health (CBDRH), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf121.
What is the incidence of and risk factors for monozygotic twinning (MZT) following single embryo transfer (SET) in ART cycles in Australia and New Zealand?
MZT occurred in 1.5% of live births following SET, with blastocyst transfer and fresh embryo transfer identified as key risk factors, while vitrified-thaw transfers were associated with a lower MZT risk.
ART has been associated with a higher incidence of MZT compared to natural conception. Previous studies have suggested younger maternal age, blastocyst culture, fresh embryo transfer, and certain ART techniques, such as assisted hatching and preimplantation genetic testing may elevate MZT risk. However, findings have been inconsistent, and with many prior studies underpowered and few reflecting contemporary ART practices.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 590 441 SET cycles conducted between 2009 and 2021 in Australia and New Zealand. The analysis included 154 671 live births following autologous SET cycles recorded in the Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproductive Technology Database (ANZARD).
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study focused on autologous fresh and thawed SET cycles. MZT incidence was estimated by applying Weinberg's differential rule, which assumes a 1:1 ratio of sex-concordant and sex-discordant dizygotic twins in the population of twins born following SET cycles. A multivariable logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations was used to identify risk factors for MZT, adjusting for potential misclassification of zygosity due to the absence of DNA confirmation.
The MZT rate was 1.5% among live births following SET. Blastocyst transfer was associated with a nearly 2-fold increase in MZT risk compared to cleavage-stage transfer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.71-2.31), and vitrified-thaw transfers had a lower MZT risk than fresh transfers (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95). Sensitivity analyses supported these findings, with consistent MZT risk patterns across subgroups by maternal age, fertilization technique, and embryo transfer type (fresh/frozen).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Zygosity estimation was based on Weinberg's differential rule rather than DNA testing, which could lead to some misclassification. Additionally, the study lacked data on embryo quality, a variable with potential influence on MZT risk, and was limited to a retrospective design, potentially introducing treatment and information biases.
This large-scale study identifies blastocyst transfer and fresh embryo transfer as significant MZT risk factor in ART, with potential implications for patient counseling and obstetric care. Future research should further investigate the mechanisms underlying these associations.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding was received from the Ferring Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd as part of the Ferring FSANZ Leaders in Fertility Research and Education grant (to R.C.P.). The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; data collection, management, analysis, and interpretation; manuscript preparation, review, or approval; or the decision to submit for publication. FSANZ contracts National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU) of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) to prepare annual reports and benchmarking reports from the ANZARD: one of those datasets is used in this study. R.C.P. is a Research Fellow of the NPESU, UNSW; C.A.V. is affiliated with the NPESU, UNSW; G.M.C. is an employee of the UNSW and is the Director of the NPESU, UNSW. C.A.V., based at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Greece), is a member of the Executive Board of the Hellenic Society of Fertility and Sterility and serves as Senior Deputy of the Steering Committee for the SIG Reproductive Endocrinology of ESHRE. C.A.V. also reports lecture and advisory roles from Merck Ltd, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Ferring, Organon, Gedeon-Richter, IBSA, Vianex, and Sonapharm; travel support from Merck Ltd, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Ferring, Organon, Gedeon-Richter, and Vianex; and holds stock or stock options in Virtus Health Ltd, all outside the submitted work. O.F. reports funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd, unrelated to this study.
N/A.
在澳大利亚和新西兰的辅助生殖技术(ART)周期中,单胚胎移植(SET)后单卵双胎(MZT)的发生率及风险因素是什么?
SET后的活产中,MZT发生率为1.5%,囊胚移植和新鲜胚胎移植被确定为关键风险因素,而玻璃化冷冻移植与较低的MZT风险相关。
与自然受孕相比,ART与MZT的较高发生率相关。先前的研究表明,母亲年龄较小、囊胚培养、新鲜胚胎移植以及某些ART技术,如辅助孵化和植入前基因检测,可能会增加MZT风险。然而,研究结果并不一致,许多先前的研究样本量不足,很少有研究反映当代ART实践。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项回顾性队列研究分析了2009年至2021年在澳大利亚和新西兰进行的590441个SET周期的数据。分析包括澳大利亚和新西兰辅助生殖技术数据库(ANZARD)中记录的154671例自体SET周期后的活产。
研究对象/材料、地点、方法:该研究聚焦于自体新鲜和冷冻解冻SET周期。MZT发生率通过应用温伯格差异法则进行估计,该法则假设在SET周期后出生的双胞胎群体中,性别一致和性别不一致的双卵双胞胎比例为1:1。使用带有广义估计方程的多变量逻辑回归模型来确定MZT的风险因素,并针对由于缺乏DNA确认导致的合子性潜在错误分类进行调整。
SET后的活产中,MZT率为1.5%。与卵裂期移植相比,囊胚移植使MZT风险增加近2倍(调整后的优势比[aOR]=1.99,95%置信区间:1.71 - 2.31),玻璃化冷冻移植的MZT风险低于新鲜移植(aOR = 0.87,95%置信区间:0.79 - 0.95)。敏感性分析支持了这些发现,不同亚组(按母亲年龄、受精技术和胚胎移植类型(新鲜/冷冻)划分)的MZT风险模式一致。
局限性、需谨慎的原因:合子性估计基于温伯格差异法则而非DNA检测,这可能导致一些错误分类。此外,该研究缺乏胚胎质量数据,而胚胎质量是一个可能影响MZT风险的变量,并且该研究仅限于回顾性设计,可能会引入治疗和信息偏倚。
这项大规模研究确定囊胚移植和新鲜胚胎移植是ART中MZT的重要风险因素,对患者咨询和产科护理可能具有潜在影响。未来的研究应进一步探究这些关联背后的机制。
研究资金/竞争利益:研究获得了辉凌制药私人有限公司的资助,作为辉凌FSANZ生育研究与教育领导者基金的一部分(授予R.C.P.)。资助者在研究的设计和实施、数据收集、管理、分析和解释、稿件准备、评审或批准以及提交发表的决定等方面均无作用。FSANZ委托新南威尔士大学(UNSW)的国家围产期流行病学和统计单位(NPESU)根据ANZARD编写年度报告和基准报告:本研究使用了其中一个数据集。R.C.P.是UNSW的NPESU的研究员;C.A.V.隶属于UNSW的NPESU;G.M.C.是UNSW的员工,也是UNSW的NPESU主任。C.A.V.位于希腊塞萨洛尼基的亚里士多德大学,是希腊生育与不育协会执行委员会成员,也是ESHRE生殖内分泌学特别兴趣小组指导委员会的高级副主席。C.A.V.还报告了来自默克有限公司、默克雪兰诺、辉凌、欧加农、吉德昂 - 里奇特、IBSA、Vianex和索纳制药的讲座和咨询角色;来自默克有限公司、默克雪兰诺、辉凌、欧加农、吉德昂 - 里奇特和Vianex的差旅支持;以及持有Virtus Health有限公司的股票或股票期权,所有这些均与提交的工作无关。O.F.报告了来自辉凌制药私人有限公司的资助,但与本研究无关。
无。