Ghazvini Kiarash, Taghiabadi Zahra, Karimi Mohammad Ali, Hosseini Bafghi Mahdi, Paryan Mahdiesadat, Amirfakhrian Razieh
Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Department of Microbiology and Virology Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Department of Microbiology and Virology of Medicine Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
JGH Open. 2025 Jun 29;9(7):e70212. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70212. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is linked to dysregulated mucosal immunity, microbiota imbalances, and environmental factors, though its exact cause remains unknown. Current treatments often have limitations, necessitating innovative therapies. This review evaluates anti-inflammatory peptides (AIPs) as emerging therapeutic agents, focusing on their efficacy in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's disease.
A systematic review was conducted in February 2023, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies published from 2010 to 2023 on AIPs for IBD treatment were retrieved from Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases using keywords such as IBDs, AIPs, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative Colitis, and therapy.
Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 12 animal studies, four clinical trials, and one case-control study. H-SN1 (snake venom peptide) and GLP-2② (glucagon-like peptide-2 dimer) effectively inhibited TNF cytotoxicity. Oral AVX-470 (bovine-derived anti-TNF antibody) reduced enterocyte TNF, MPO, and apoptosis levels. Ac2-26 (annexin A1 mimic) and αs2-casein peptide combined with synbiotics were shown to restore gut homeostasis and dysbiosis. AMP-18 (gastrokine-1) and MBCP (buffalo milk peptide) stabilized tight junctions, preserving intestinal barrier integrity and potentially preventing IBD progression.
AIPs effectively reduce inflammation, regulate gut microbiota, and stabilize the intestinal barrier, showing promise for managing IBD. However, their therapeutic potential is limited by protease degradation, poor bioavailability, and possible cytotoxicity. Future research should enhance their stability, delivery systems, and pharmacokinetic properties to optimize their clinical applicability and safety.
炎症性肠病(IBD)与黏膜免疫失调、微生物群失衡及环境因素有关,但其确切病因尚不清楚。目前的治疗方法往往存在局限性,因此需要创新疗法。本综述评估了抗炎肽(AIPs)作为新兴治疗药物的潜力,重点关注其在溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病中的疗效。
2023年2月进行了一项系统综述,遵循PRISMA 2020指南。使用“炎症性肠病”“抗炎肽”“克罗恩病”“溃疡性结肠炎”和“治疗”等关键词,从Medline、科学网和Cochrane数据库中检索2010年至2023年发表的关于AIPs治疗IBD的研究。
17项研究符合纳入标准,包括12项动物研究、4项临床试验和1项病例对照研究。H-SN1(蛇毒肽)和GLP-2②(胰高血糖素样肽-2二聚体)有效抑制肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)的细胞毒性。口服AVX-470(牛源抗TNF抗体)可降低肠细胞TNF、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)水平及细胞凋亡率。Ac2-26(膜联蛋白A1模拟物)和αs2-酪蛋白肽联合合生元可恢复肠道稳态并改善肠道菌群失调。AMP-18(胃动素-1)和MBCP(水牛奶肽)可稳定紧密连接,维持肠道屏障完整性,并可能预防IBD进展。
AIPs可有效减轻炎症、调节肠道微生物群并稳定肠道屏障,在IBD治疗方面具有潜力。然而,其治疗潜力受到蛋白酶降解、生物利用度低和可能的细胞毒性的限制。未来的研究应提高其稳定性、递送系统和药代动力学特性,以优化其临床适用性和安全性。