Zhang Xing, Tian Liang, Wu Jiaying, Chen Taiyao, Shi Tingting, Ge Yilin, Zhu Renyi, Chen Jian
Department of Infectious Disease Control, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Department of Pathogen Biological Laboratory, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 19;16:1609148. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1609148. eCollection 2025.
Carbapenem-resistant (CRAB) poses a significant threat to human health in hospital settings. These environments could serve as a reservoir for CRAB, since (AB) exhibits strong survival capabilities outside the human body. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the distribution of CRAB in the environment and identify the risk factors associated with its positive detection rate.
From 2018 to 2023, long-term environmental monitoring of surfaces around CRAB patients was conducted across 16 hospitals in Shanghai. During each quarter, 48 environmental samples, along with information about the samples, were collected. Bacterial isolates were collected, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (2019-2021 edition). The CRAB detection rate in the environmental samples was compared across different variables. For nominal categorical variables, intergroup differences were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared (χ) test. In addition, logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors associated with CRAB-positive environmental samples.
A total of 10,268 samples were included in this study, among which 391 tested positive for CRAB. The overall CRAB positivity rate on environmental surfaces was 3.81%. Significant differences in positivity rates were observed across hospital levels, departments, sampling locations, and exposure frequencies ( < 0.05). Compared to Class B secondary hospitals, the following hospital classes showed significantly higher risks of CRAB detection: Class A secondary hospitals ( = 13.34, 95%: 3.25-54.79, < 0.001), Class B tertiary hospitals ( = 20.63, 95%: 5.10-83.49, < 0.001), and Class A tertiary hospitals ( = 8.77, 95%: 2.14-35.87, = 0.003). Compared to internal medicine departments, environmental surfaces in the following high-risk departments demonstrated higher rates of CRAB detection: surgical departments ( = 1.93, 95%: 1.23-3.05, = 0.005) and intensive care units (ICUs) ( = 3.10, 95%: 2.19-4.39, < 0.001). Additionally, surfaces located inside wards ( = 1.834, 95%: 1.230 ~ 2.736, = 0.003) and those with high-touch frequency ( = 1.467, 95%: 1.134 ~ 1.898, = 0.003) were identified as risk factors for the positive detection rate of CRAB in the environment.
Class A secondary hospitals and Class B tertiary hospitals should prioritize infection control measures to prevent the dissemination of CRAB. Special attention should be given to high-risk areas, such as the surgical department and ICU, with enhanced disinfection of high-touch surfaces within patient wards.
耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)在医院环境中对人类健康构成重大威胁。这些环境可能成为CRAB的储存库,因为鲍曼不动杆菌(AB)在人体外具有很强的生存能力。因此,有必要调查CRAB在环境中的分布情况,并确定与其阳性检出率相关的危险因素。
2018年至2023年,对上海16家医院的CRAB患者周围环境表面进行长期监测。每季度收集48份环境样本及样本相关信息。收集细菌分离株,并按照临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南(2019 - 2021版)进行抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)。比较不同变量下环境样本中CRAB的检出率。对于名义分类变量,使用Pearson卡方(χ²)检验分析组间差异。此外,采用逻辑回归分析确定与CRAB阳性环境样本相关的危险因素。
本研究共纳入10268份样本,其中391份CRAB检测呈阳性。环境表面CRAB总体阳性率为3.81%。在医院级别、科室、采样地点和暴露频率方面观察到阳性率存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。与乙类二级医院相比,以下医院级别CRAB检测风险显著更高:甲类二级医院(OR = 13.34,95%CI:3.25 - 54.79,P < 0.001)、乙类三级医院(OR = 20.63,95%CI:5.10 - 83.49,P < 0.001)和甲类三级医院(OR = 8.77,95%CI:2.14 - 35.87,P = 0.003)。与内科相比,以下高风险科室的环境表面CRAB检测率更高:外科(OR = 1.93,95%CI:1.23 - 3.05,P = 0.005)和重症监护病房(ICU)(OR = 3.10,95%CI:2.19 - 4.39,P < 0.001)。此外,病房内表面(OR = 1.834,95%CI:1.230~2.736,P = 0.003)和高接触频率表面(OR = 1.467,95%CI:1.134~1.898,P = 0.003)被确定为环境中CRAB阳性检出率的危险因素因素。
甲类二级医院和乙类三级医院应优先采取感染控制措施,以防止CRAB传播。应特别关注高风险区域,如外科和ICU,加强病房内高接触表面的消毒。