Roose Eva, Van Bogaert Wouter, Mostaqim Kenza, Huysmans Eva, Nijs Jo, van Wilgen C Paul, Beckwée David, Timmermans Annick, Fontaine Christel, Lahousse Astrid
Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (KIMA), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 9;33(8):670. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09655-8.
The construct of perceived injustice is receiving increased attention in pain research due to its relationship with adverse pain outcomes. Even though cancer survivors face a 30% risk of developing pain, there is a notable lack of research exploring this relationship within this population. Therefore, this study aims to explore the relationship of perceived injustice with pain severity in breast cancer survivors (BCS).
A directed acyclic graph (DAG) (i.e., path model) was multidisciplinary created a priori, positioning perceived injustice -measured with the Injustice Experienced Questionnaire (IEQ)- as the main exposure variable and pain severity -measured with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- as the main outcome variable, with the addition of explanatory variables within the relationship of IEQ and BPI. Data from 156 female BCS with pain and perceived injustice were analysed using structural equation modelling, with confidence intervals estimated through Montecarlo simulation.
Perceived injustice did not have a significant univariate direct relationship with pain severity (β = 0.186, p = 0.102). However, in the complete path model including explanatory outcomes, a significant relationship was observed (β = 0.304, 95% CI [0.136; 0.477]), explaining 22,5% of the variance in pain severity. In the complete model, the greatest proportion of the effect was mediated through pain catastrophizing (β = 0.226, 95% CI [0.101; 0.376]).
The findings indicate that perceived injustice has an important relationship with pain severity levels of BCS experiencing pain and perceived injustice. Multimodal intervention studies are suggested for future investigation as a treatment for pain in BCS.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04730154.
由于感知不公正与不良疼痛结果之间的关系,其概念在疼痛研究中受到越来越多的关注。尽管癌症幸存者有30%的风险会出现疼痛,但在这一人群中,探索这种关系的研究明显不足。因此,本研究旨在探讨乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)中感知不公正与疼痛严重程度之间的关系。
预先多学科创建了一个有向无环图(DAG)(即路径模型),将用经历不公正问卷(IEQ)测量的感知不公正作为主要暴露变量,用简明疼痛量表(BPI)测量的疼痛严重程度作为主要结果变量,并在IEQ和BPI的关系中添加解释变量。使用结构方程模型分析了156名有疼痛和感知不公正的女性BCS的数据,通过蒙特卡洛模拟估计置信区间。
感知不公正与疼痛严重程度没有显著的单变量直接关系(β = 0.186,p = 0.102)。然而,在包括解释性结果的完整路径模型中,观察到显著关系(β = 0.304,95% CI [0.136; 0.477]),解释了疼痛严重程度变异的22.5%。在完整模型中,最大比例的效应是通过疼痛灾难化介导的(β = 0.226,95% CI [0.101; 0.376])。
研究结果表明,感知不公正与经历疼痛和感知不公正的BCS的疼痛严重程度水平有重要关系。建议未来进行多模式干预研究,作为BCS疼痛的一种治疗方法。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04730154。