Minja Lilian Tina, van der Feltz Isabella, Manyama Christina, Mpagama Stellah, Mhimbira Francis, Noreña Ivan, Sebe Modulakgotla, Rassool Mohammed, Wallis Robert S, Ntinginya Nyanda, Liyoyo Alphonce, Mbeya Beno, Wagnerberger Larissa, Zumba Tresphory, Peter Daud D, Makkan Heeran, Sloan Derek J, Brake Lindsey Te, Schildkraut Jodie A, Aarnoutse Rob, McHugh Timothy D, Wildner Leticia, Boeree Martin J, Geiter Lawrence, Cho Young-Lag, Aldana Brian H, Phillips Patrick P J, Hoelscher Michael, Svensson Elin M, Heinrich Norbert
National Institute for Medical Research, Mbeya, Tanzania.
Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and, Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00289-0.
Linezolid plays a crucial role in the first-line treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis globally. Its prolonged use can lead to neurological and haematological toxicity, highlighting the need for safer oxazolidinones. Delpazolid, a novel oxazolidinone, might be safer. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of delpazolid and identify an optimal dose.
PanACEA-DECODE-01 was a prospective, randomised, open-label, phase 2b, multicentre, dose-finding trial done in five tuberculosis trial sites in Tanzania and South Africa. Adults aged 18-65 years, who weighed 40-90 kg, and had newly diagnosed, smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) through centralised allocation, using a probabilistic minimisation algorithm to receive no delpazolid (D0), delpazolid 400 mg once daily (D400), delpazolid 800 mg once daily (D800), delpazolid 1200 mg once daily (D1200), or delpazolid 800 mg twice daily (D800BD), all administered orally for 16 weeks with follow-up to week 52. All participants received bedaquiline (400 mg orally once daily for the first 14 days, then 200 mg orally thrice weekly), delamanid (100 mg orally twice daily), and moxifloxacin (400 mg orally once daily). Randomisation was stratified based on bacterial load in sputum as measured by GeneXpert cycle threshold (<16 vs ≥16), site, and HIV status. The primary efficacy objective was to establish an exposure-response model with the primary endpoint, measured in the modified intention-to-treat population, of change in mycobacterial load measured by time to positivity using the liquid culture mycobacterial growth indicator tube system. A secondary outcome was the time on treatment to sustained conversion to negative sputum culture in liquid media. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of oxazolidinone class toxicities defined as peripheral or optical neuropathy, incident leukopenia, anaemia or thrombocytopenia, or adverse events in line with tyramine pressor response, all of grade 2 or higher, possibly, probably or definitely related to delpazolid. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04550832.
Between Oct 28, 2021, and Aug 31, 2022, 156 individuals were screened for eligibility, 76 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to D0 (n=15), D400 (n=15), D800 (n=15), D1200 (n=16), or D800BD (n=15). 60 (79%) of 76 participants were male and 16 (21%) were female. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling suggests maximal microbiological activity at a daily total exposure of delpazolid (area under the concentration curve from 0 h to 24 h [AUC]) of 50 mg/L per h; close to the median exposure observed after a 1200 mg dose. This maximal effect was estimated at a 38% (95% CI 4-83; p=0·025) faster decline in bacterial load compared with no delpazolid. In the secondary time-to-event analysis, there was no significant difference in time to culture conversion between treatment arms or exposure tertile. When all delpazolid-containing groups were combined, the hazard ratio for the time to sustained culture conversion to negative, comparing all delpazolid-containing groups with the group without delpazolid was 1·53 (95% CI 0·84-2·76). Two drug-related serious adverse events (one gastritis and one anaemia) occurred in the D800BD group, with high individual AUC. Apart from the anaemia and one event of brief, moderate neutropenia observed at only one visit in the D800 group not in line with the characteristics of oxazolidinone class toxicity, no oxazolidinone class toxicities occurred.
The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling results suggest that delpazolid adds efficacy on top of bedaquiline, delamanid, and moxifloxacin; and that a dose of 1200 mg once daily would result in exposures with maximum efficacy. That dose was shown to be safe, raising hope that linezolid toxicities could be averted in long-term treatment. Delpazolid is a promising drug for future tuberculosis treatment regimens and could be widely usable if safety and efficacy are confirmed in larger trials.
LigaChem Biosciences, EDCTP2 programme supported by the EU; German Ministry for Education and Research; German Center for Infection Research; Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation; and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.
利奈唑胺在全球耐多药结核病的一线治疗中发挥着关键作用。其长期使用可导致神经和血液学毒性,凸显了对更安全的恶唑烷酮类药物的需求。新型恶唑烷酮类药物地拉唑胺可能更安全。我们旨在评估地拉唑胺的安全性和疗效,并确定最佳剂量。
PanACEA-DECODE-01是一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、2b期、多中心、剂量探索试验,在坦桑尼亚和南非的五个结核病试验点进行。年龄在18-65岁、体重40-90kg、新诊断为涂片阳性肺结核的成年人通过集中分配,使用概率最小化算法随机分配(1:1:1:1:1),接受不使用地拉唑胺(D0)、每日一次400mg地拉唑胺(D400)、每日一次800mg地拉唑胺(D800)、每日一次1200mg地拉唑胺(D1200)或每日两次800mg地拉唑胺(D800BD),均口服给药16周,并随访至第52周。所有参与者均接受贝达喹啉(前14天每日一次口服400mg,然后每周三次口服200mg)、德拉马尼(每日两次口服100mg)和莫西沙星(每日一次口服400mg)。随机分组根据GeneXpert循环阈值(<16 vs≥16)测量的痰液细菌载量、试验点和HIV状态进行分层。主要疗效目标是建立暴露-反应模型,主要终点为改良意向性治疗人群中使用液体培养分枝杆菌生长指示管系统通过阳性时间测量的分枝杆菌载量变化。次要结果是在液体培养基中治疗至痰培养持续转阴的时间。主要安全结果是恶唑烷酮类毒性的发生,定义为周围或视神经病变、新发白细胞减少、贫血或血小板减少,或符合酪胺升压反应的不良事件,均为2级或更高,可能、很可能或肯定与地拉唑胺有关。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT04550832。
2021年10月28日至2022年8月31日期间,156人接受了资格筛查,其中76人入组并随机分配至D0(n=15)、D400(n=15)、D800(n=15)、D1200(n=16)或D800BD(n=15)组。76名参与者中60名(79%)为男性,16名(21%)为女性。群体药代动力学-药效学模型表明,地拉唑胺每日总暴露量(0小时至24小时浓度曲线下面积[AUC])为50mg/L per h时具有最大微生物活性;接近1200mg剂量后观察到的中位暴露量。与不使用地拉唑胺相比估计这种最大效应为细菌载量下降速度快38%(95%CI 4-83;p=0.025)。在次要事件发生时间分析中,各治疗组或暴露三分位数之间在培养转阴时间上无显著差异。当所有含地拉唑胺组合并时,将所有含地拉唑胺组与不含地拉唑胺组相比,持续培养转阴至阴性的时间的风险比为1.53(95%CI 0.84-2.76)。D800BD组发生了两例与药物相关的严重不良事件(一例胃炎和一例贫血),个体AUC较高。除了D800组仅在一次访视时观察到的不符合恶唑烷酮类毒性特征的贫血和一例短暂、中度中性粒细胞减少事件外,未发生恶唑烷酮类毒性。
药代动力学-药效学模型结果表明,地拉唑胺在贝达喹啉、德拉马尼和莫西沙星的基础上增加了疗效;每日一次1200mg的剂量将产生具有最大疗效的暴露量。该剂量被证明是安全的,这为长期治疗中避免利奈唑胺毒性带来了希望。地拉唑胺是未来结核病治疗方案中一种有前景的药物,如果在更大规模试验中证实其安全性和疗效,可能会得到广泛应用。
LigaChem Biosciences、由欧盟支持的EDCTP2计划;德国教育与研究部;德国感染研究中心;瑞士教育、研究与创新国务秘书处;以及荷兰科学研究组织。