Suppr超能文献

局部麻醉药对多重耐药菌的体外抗菌活性。

Antibacterial activity of local anesthetics against multidrug-resistant bacteria in vitro.

作者信息

Lee Jin Sol, Moon Jeongeun, Lee Joo Yong, Kim Hyeon Tae, Park Sanghi, Park Jin-Wook, Shin Young Duck

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, South Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, South Korea.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4774-4778. doi: 10.62347/GKXF8390. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Local anesthetics are widely used in clinical settings for pain management. In addition to their analgesic effects, they may also exhibit antimicrobial properties. However, data on their activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of lidocaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine against MDR bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB).

METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of each anesthetic were determined using the standardized broth microdilution method according to CLSI guidelines. Clinical isolates of MRPA, CRE, and MRAB were tested. Identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK II systems. The local anesthetics were diluted to clinically relevant concentrations and tested in duplicate.

RESULTS

Bupivacaine exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity, with MICs of 1.6 mg/mL for MRAB and 3.2 mg/mL for CRE. Lidocaine showed limited activity, with an MIC of 16 mg/mL for MRPA. Levobupivacaine showed intermediate effects. In all cases, MBCs were higher than the corresponding MICs. These findings suggest differential antibacterial efficacy among the agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Local anesthetics demonstrated measurable antibacterial effects against MDR pathogens in vitro. Bupivacaine showed the strongest activity but has a lower clinical dosage limit due to its cardiotoxicity. While lidocaine has weaker antibacterial potency, its widespread use and safety profile make it a practical option. These results suggest local anesthetics may play a complementary role in infection-prone procedures but require cautious interpretation for clinical application.

摘要

目的

局部麻醉药在临床环境中广泛用于疼痛管理。除了其镇痛作用外,它们还可能具有抗菌特性。然而,关于它们对多重耐药(MDR)病原体活性的数据有限。本研究旨在评估利多卡因、左旋布比卡因和布比卡因对MDR细菌的体外抗菌活性,包括铜绿假单胞菌(MRPA)、耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)和鲍曼不动杆菌(MRAB)。

方法

根据CLSI指南,使用标准化肉汤微量稀释法测定每种麻醉药的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC)。对MRPA、CRE和MRAB的临床分离株进行检测。使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)和VITEK II系统进行鉴定。将局部麻醉药稀释至临床相关浓度并进行重复测试。

结果

布比卡因表现出最强的抗菌活性,对MRAB的MIC为1.6 mg/mL,对CRE的MIC为3.2 mg/mL。利多卡因活性有限,对MRPA的MIC为16 mg/mL。左旋布比卡因表现出中等效果。在所有情况下,MBC均高于相应的MIC。这些发现表明不同药物之间存在抗菌效果差异。

结论

局部麻醉药在体外对MDR病原体表现出可测量的抗菌作用。布比卡因活性最强,但由于其心脏毒性,临床剂量限制较低。虽然利多卡因的抗菌效力较弱,但其广泛使用和安全性使其成为一个实用的选择。这些结果表明局部麻醉药可能在易感染手术中发挥辅助作用,但临床应用时需要谨慎解读。

相似文献

1
Antibacterial activity of local anesthetics against multidrug-resistant bacteria in vitro.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4774-4778. doi: 10.62347/GKXF8390. eCollection 2025.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
4
Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3.
5
Local anaesthesia for pain control in first trimester surgical abortion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 13;2(2):CD006712. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006712.pub3.
7
Exploring the additive antibacterial potential of volatile oil and imipenem against : a multi-omics investigation.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1578322. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1578322. eCollection 2025.
8
Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003345.pub2.
9
Does Cement Viscosity Impact Antibiotic Elution and In Vitro Efficacy Against Common Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):488-497. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003272. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Local anesthetics as a tool for Staphylococcus spp. control: a systematic review.
Braz J Microbiol. 2024 Jun;55(2):1427-1435. doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01285-2. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
The effect of local anesthetics against planktonic forms and film formation of strains and its dependence on antiseptics activity.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Aug 29;14:1199899. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1199899. eCollection 2023.
3
Changing Epidemiology of Pathogenic Bacteria Over the Past 20 Years in Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Mar 13;38(10):e73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e73.
4
A review and new insights to antimicrobial action of local anesthetics.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;38(6):991-1002. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-03460-4. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;9(2):205-13. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.036.
8
Spontaneous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis in nondrug users.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Feb;31(4):271-8. doi: 10.1053/sarh.2002.29492.
9
Antimicrobial effects of lidocaine in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000 Feb;45(2):217-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/45.2.217.
10
Poor antibacterial effect of ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine.
Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):884-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00047.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验