Lee Jin Sol, Moon Jeongeun, Lee Joo Yong, Kim Hyeon Tae, Park Sanghi, Park Jin-Wook, Shin Young Duck
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, South Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, South Korea.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4774-4778. doi: 10.62347/GKXF8390. eCollection 2025.
Local anesthetics are widely used in clinical settings for pain management. In addition to their analgesic effects, they may also exhibit antimicrobial properties. However, data on their activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of lidocaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine against MDR bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB).
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of each anesthetic were determined using the standardized broth microdilution method according to CLSI guidelines. Clinical isolates of MRPA, CRE, and MRAB were tested. Identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK II systems. The local anesthetics were diluted to clinically relevant concentrations and tested in duplicate.
Bupivacaine exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity, with MICs of 1.6 mg/mL for MRAB and 3.2 mg/mL for CRE. Lidocaine showed limited activity, with an MIC of 16 mg/mL for MRPA. Levobupivacaine showed intermediate effects. In all cases, MBCs were higher than the corresponding MICs. These findings suggest differential antibacterial efficacy among the agents.
Local anesthetics demonstrated measurable antibacterial effects against MDR pathogens in vitro. Bupivacaine showed the strongest activity but has a lower clinical dosage limit due to its cardiotoxicity. While lidocaine has weaker antibacterial potency, its widespread use and safety profile make it a practical option. These results suggest local anesthetics may play a complementary role in infection-prone procedures but require cautious interpretation for clinical application.
局部麻醉药在临床环境中广泛用于疼痛管理。除了其镇痛作用外,它们还可能具有抗菌特性。然而,关于它们对多重耐药(MDR)病原体活性的数据有限。本研究旨在评估利多卡因、左旋布比卡因和布比卡因对MDR细菌的体外抗菌活性,包括铜绿假单胞菌(MRPA)、耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)和鲍曼不动杆菌(MRAB)。
根据CLSI指南,使用标准化肉汤微量稀释法测定每种麻醉药的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC)。对MRPA、CRE和MRAB的临床分离株进行检测。使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)和VITEK II系统进行鉴定。将局部麻醉药稀释至临床相关浓度并进行重复测试。
布比卡因表现出最强的抗菌活性,对MRAB的MIC为1.6 mg/mL,对CRE的MIC为3.2 mg/mL。利多卡因活性有限,对MRPA的MIC为16 mg/mL。左旋布比卡因表现出中等效果。在所有情况下,MBC均高于相应的MIC。这些发现表明不同药物之间存在抗菌效果差异。
局部麻醉药在体外对MDR病原体表现出可测量的抗菌作用。布比卡因活性最强,但由于其心脏毒性,临床剂量限制较低。虽然利多卡因的抗菌效力较弱,但其广泛使用和安全性使其成为一个实用的选择。这些结果表明局部麻醉药可能在易感染手术中发挥辅助作用,但临床应用时需要谨慎解读。