Van Oirschot Matthew, Verma Saurav, Breadner Daniel, Vucetic Andrea
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Division of Medical Oncology, Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Ann Transl Med. 2025 Jun 27;13(3):32. doi: 10.21037/atm-25-38. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), for which 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is commonly part of the chemotherapy regimen. Given that 5-FU has a mean cardiotoxicity risk of approximately 5%, raltitrexed has often been used as an alternative in patients with a history of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity or significant coronary artery disease (CAD). We report the first case, to our knowledge, of the use of raltitrexed in place of 5-FU in combination with pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic esophageal cancer in a patient with CAD.
A 75-year-old gentleman with preexisting multivessel CAD was diagnosed with metastatic gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after presenting to medical attention with a 2-month history of worsening chest pain in addition to progressive dysphagia associated with weight loss. Following initial treatment with palliative locoregional radiotherapy to the lower mediastinum, GEJ, and upper abdomen, the decision was made to proceed with palliative systemic therapy. Considering his significant cardiac history, 5-FU was replaced with raltitrexed and combined with carboplatin and pembrolizumab. After a total of 10 months of treatment, the patient presented to hospital with recurrent chest pain and was diagnosed with a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Despite radiographic evidence of stability of his malignancy on systemic therapy, he was not considered to be a candidate for cardiac intervention. He was thus transitioned to a comfort-focused care approach and passed away shortly thereafter, with the cause of death being acute coronary syndrome.
Although the patient unfortunately passed away prematurely due to preexisting CAD, there was no evidence of disease progression in the 10 months that he received treatment. In addition to an encouraging progression-free survival (PFS), the patient reported an overall improvement in quality of life while on therapy with no signals of toxicity from raltitrexed or immunotherapy. Overall, the present case demonstrates that chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer appears to be safe and effective when raltitrexed is substituted for 5-FU, which is of particular relevance due to the many overlapping characteristics of patients with cardiac pathology and esophageal cancer.
化学免疫疗法是转移性食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的标准治疗方法,5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)通常是化疗方案的一部分。鉴于5-FU的平均心脏毒性风险约为5%,对于有氟嘧啶相关心脏毒性病史或严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者,雷替曲塞常被用作替代药物。据我们所知,我们报告了首例在一名CAD患者中使用雷替曲塞替代5-FU联合帕博利珠单抗和铂类化疗治疗转移性食管癌的病例。
一名75岁男性,既往有多支冠状动脉病变,因胸痛加重2个月并伴有进行性吞咽困难和体重减轻前来就医,被诊断为转移性胃食管交界(GEJ)鳞状细胞癌(SCC)。在对下纵隔、GEJ和上腹部进行姑息性局部放疗初始治疗后,决定进行姑息性全身治疗。考虑到他有严重的心脏病史,用雷替曲塞替代5-FU,并与卡铂和帕博利珠单抗联合使用。经过总共10个月的治疗,患者因复发性胸痛入院,被诊断为非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)。尽管影像学证据显示其恶性肿瘤在全身治疗后病情稳定,但他不被认为是心脏介入治疗的候选人。因此,他转而采用以舒适为重点的护理方法,此后不久去世,死因是急性冠状动脉综合征。
尽管患者因既往CAD不幸过早去世,但在他接受治疗的10个月中没有疾病进展的证据。除了令人鼓舞的无进展生存期(PFS)外,患者报告在治疗期间生活质量总体有所改善,没有雷替曲塞或免疫治疗的毒性信号。总体而言,本病例表明,当用雷替曲塞替代5-FU时,化疗联合免疫疗法治疗晚期食管癌似乎是安全有效的,这对于患有心脏疾病和食管癌的患者的许多重叠特征尤为重要。