Suppr超能文献

间质高剂量率近距离放射治疗与立体定向放射治疗在屏气技术治疗不可切除原发性和继发性肝肿瘤中的比较。

Comparison of interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold technique for inoperable primary and secondary liver tumors.

作者信息

Geissler Philipp, Spautz Saskia, Hering Kathrin, Seiler Isabell, Heinicke Frank, Sachpazidis Ilias, Baltas Dimos, Schäfer Sebastian, Moustakis Christos, Nicolay Nils H, Nägler Franziska

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 13;35:100811. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100811. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In recent years, ablative radiotherapy of primary and secondary liver tumors has become a highly regarded treatment option. We aimed to compare high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-iBT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) in order to support future decisions on the appropriate radiation technique for liver tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with 1-4 liver malignancies undergoing HDR-iBT with 1x15-20 Gy were included. Eighty-eight SBRT plans in DIBH or FB with a prescription dose of 3x12.5 Gy to the surrounding 67 % isodose were generated using the HDR-iBT-computed tomography. Dose-volume parameters according to ICRU91 regarding organs-at-risk (OAR), target coverage, generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), biological dose parameters, dose uniformity, conformity and plan quality indices were compared.

RESULTS

The mean target doses for HDR-iBT were at least twice as high as in SBRT, but target coverage was significantly more conformal for SBRT and the gEUD was higher ( < 0.001). The healthy tissue conformity indices (HTCI) for SBRT and SBRT were significantly higher than for HDR-iBT ( < 0.001). For all techniques, a significant positive correlation between HTCI and target volume size was found. HDR-iBT achieved lower mean and maximum doses for most investigated OAR-parameters. Comparing SBRT and SBRT, all OAR-parameters presented significantly lower values for SBRT ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

While SBRT achieved a more conformal target coverage with both higher minimal doses and gEUD, brachytherapy offered higher mean and maximal doses to the target volume and a better sparing of OAR, depending on optimal catheter positioning.

摘要

背景与目的

近年来,原发性和继发性肝肿瘤的消融放疗已成为备受关注的治疗选择。我们旨在比较高剂量率组织间近距离放疗(HDR-iBT)与立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)在自由呼吸(FB)和深吸气屏气(DIBH)状态下的情况,以辅助未来对肝肿瘤合适放疗技术的决策。

材料与方法

纳入42例接受1×15 - 20 Gy HDR-iBT治疗的1 - 4个肝恶性肿瘤患者。利用HDR-iBT计算机断层扫描生成88个在DIBH或FB状态下的SBRT计划,处方剂量为3×12.5 Gy至周围67%等剂量线。比较了根据ICRU91关于危及器官(OAR)、靶区覆盖、广义等效均匀剂量(gEUD)、生物剂量参数、剂量均匀性、适形度和计划质量指数的剂量体积参数。

结果

HDR-iBT的平均靶区剂量至少是SBRT的两倍,但SBRT的靶区覆盖适形性显著更高,且gEUD更高(P < 0.001)。SBRT和SBRT的健康组织适形指数(HTCI)显著高于HDR-iBT(P < 0.001)。对于所有技术,发现HTCI与靶区体积大小之间存在显著正相关。HDR-iBT在大多数研究的OAR参数方面实现了更低的平均和最大剂量。比较SBRT和SBRT,所有OAR参数在SBRT时的值均显著更低(P < 0.001)。

结论

虽然SBRT实现了更适形的靶区覆盖,具有更高的最小剂量和gEUD,但近距离放疗根据最佳导管定位为靶区体积提供了更高的平均和最大剂量,并更好地保护了OAR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验