Cenaj Denisa, Schulte-Uentrop Leonie, Laura Kröger Leonie Fee, Küllmei Josephine, Haus Jan-Marcus, Moll-Khosrawi Parisa
Department of Anesthesia, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Jul 24;12:23821205251358090. doi: 10.1177/23821205251358090. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Peyton approach with the traditional 2-step approach instruction and to clarify if a possible superiority can be attributed to specific skill domains. The primary and secondary outcome were the quality of resuscitation, reflected by technical (TS)- and nontechnical skills (NTS). The tertiary outcome were the subjective learning gains of the undergraduates.
In a randomized controlled simulation study, second year medical undergraduates participated in compulsory Advanced Cardiac Life Support training (ACLS). The control group received the 2-step approach and the intervention group Peyton's 4 step approach as a training instruction.
N = 290 second year medical undergraduates participated in the study. There were no relevant differences between both groups in purely haptically skills like chest compression. The intervention group showed significantly better procedural skills of ACLS skill domains, resulting in lower no-flow time during the scenarios ((120) = 2.132, = .035)). NTS of both groups did not differ ((150) = 1.694, = .092)). Undergraduates of the intervention group reported significant higher learning gains for procedural ACLS skills, like performing the algorithm ( < .001).
Integrating Peyton's 4-step approach into structured ACLS training enhances procedural cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills, adherence to the ACLS algorithm, and skill retention in advanced stages of medical education, especially when undergraduates have prior resuscitation experience. While the method shows limited benefit for teaching discrete tactile skills in earlier stages, its strategic inclusion in later phases can optimize curriculum design by aligning advanced teaching methods with learners' developmental needs. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring ACLS education to maximize training effectiveness and improve resuscitation outcomes.
本研究旨在比较佩顿教学法与传统两步教学法的有效性,并阐明是否能将可能存在的优势归因于特定技能领域。主要和次要结果是复苏质量,通过技术技能(TS)和非技术技能(NTS)来体现。第三结果是本科生的主观学习收获。
在一项随机对照模拟研究中,医学专业二年级本科生参加了强制性高级心脏生命支持培训(ACLS)。对照组接受两步教学法,干预组接受佩顿四步教学法作为培训指导。
290名医学专业二年级本科生参与了该研究。在单纯触觉技能如胸外按压方面,两组之间没有相关差异。干预组在ACLS技能领域的操作技能明显更好,导致模拟场景中的无血流时间更短(t(120)=2.132,p=0.035)。两组的非技术技能没有差异(t(150)=1.694,p=0.092)。干预组的本科生报告称,在ACLS操作技能方面的学习收获显著更高,如执行操作流程(p<0.001))。
将佩顿四步教学法纳入结构化ACLS培训可提高心肺复苏操作技能、对ACLS操作流程的依从性以及医学教育后期阶段的技能保持,尤其是当本科生有先前的复苏经验时。虽然该方法在早期阶段教授离散触觉技能方面益处有限,但其在后期阶段的策略性纳入可通过使先进教学方法与学习者的发展需求相匹配来优化课程设计。这些发现凸显了调整ACLS教育以最大化培训效果和改善复苏结果的重要性。