Lee Jiyeon, Kim Miryoung, Han Hyun Jin, Kim Siin, Suh Hae Sun
Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea; Institute of Regulatory Innovation through Science (IRIS), Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea; College of Pharmacy, Sunchon National University, Sunchon, South Korea.
Lung Cancer. 2025 Aug;206:108682. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108682. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown limited efficacy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and their role in later-line settings remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of ICI monotherapy compared to chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had limited remaining treatment options.
We conducted a target trial emulation using data from the Cancer Public Library Database under the K-CURE project, which integrates national cancer registry, mortality, medical check-up and health insurance claims data in Korea. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had EGFR-mutated NSCLC with progression after both EGFR-TKI and platinum-based chemotherapy, and initiated ICI monotherapy or chemotherapy between August 2017 and December 2020. Propensity score matching was used to balance treatment groups. Overall survival was analyzed using time-dependent statistical methods to account for non-proportional hazards.
Of 1,914 eligible patients, 663 matched pairs were analyzed. While standard Cox analysis showed no significant OS difference (HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.80-1.03), time-dependent analyses revealed a late survival benefit for ICI beyond 6.8 months (HR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.59-0.88). Subgroup analyses revealed heterogeneous treatment effects, with greater long-term benefits in patients of older age, those with concurrent malignancies, and those without prior osimertinib exposure. Sensitivity analyses suggested a potential role for high PD-L1 expression as a biomarker of ICI response in this setting.
ICI monotherapy may offer time-dependent survival benefits over chemotherapy in selected patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after standard treatment failure, supporting its consideration in later-line clinical decision-making.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中疗效有限,其在后续治疗中的作用仍不明确。本研究旨在评估在剩余治疗选择有限的EGFR突变NSCLC患者中,ICI单药治疗与化疗相比的真实世界有效性。
我们利用韩国癌症治愈(K-CURE)项目下癌症公共图书馆数据库的数据进行了一项目标试验模拟,该项目整合了韩国的国家癌症登记、死亡率、体检和医疗保险理赔数据。符合条件的患者年龄≥18岁,患有EGFR突变的NSCLC,在接受EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)和铂类化疗后病情进展,并于2017年8月至2020年12月期间开始接受ICI单药治疗或化疗。采用倾向评分匹配法平衡治疗组。使用时间依赖性统计方法分析总生存期,以考虑非比例风险。
在1914例符合条件的患者中,分析了663对匹配病例。虽然标准Cox分析显示总生存期无显著差异(风险比[HR]为0.91,95%置信区间[CI]为0.80-1.03),但时间依赖性分析显示,ICI在6.8个月后具有晚期生存获益(HR为0.72,95%CI为0.59-0.88)。亚组分析显示治疗效果存在异质性,年龄较大、合并恶性肿瘤以及未接受过奥希替尼治疗的患者长期获益更大。敏感性分析表明,高程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)表达在这种情况下可能作为ICI反应的生物标志物发挥作用。
在标准治疗失败后,ICI单药治疗可能为部分EGFR突变NSCLC患者带来时间依赖性的生存获益,支持在后续临床决策中考虑使用。