Schairer Jasmin, Höchsmann Alisa, Bauer Benedikt, Höfer Volker, Römer Jennifer, Neusüß Christian
Faculty of Chemistry, Aalen University, Aalen, Germany.
Faculty of Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
MAbs. 2025 Dec;17(1):2537116. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2025.2537116. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
Monoclonal antibody (mAb) charge variant analysis, which ensures the quality of biopharmaceuticals, is primarily performed by either cation exchange chromatography (CEX), capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF), or capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). Though selectivity is different for all methods, mAb proteoforms can be quantified on the intact level with a low risk of artifacts. Identification and characterization can be performed by mass spectrometry (MS), but coupling is hampered by the use of nonvolatile constituents. Here, we present comparative data and a thorough review of CEX-MS, CIEF-MS, and CZE-MS for the analysis of charge variants on the intact level. The separation of the proteoforms is confirmed by online UV detection with subsequent online MS coupling. Each method was tested for generic use by measuring 10 mAbs with an isoelectric point (pI) of 7.3 to 8.7 without individually adjusting the method parameters for each mAb. The methods and the identified proteoforms are compared among each other as well as to a previously published CZE-MS method on the subunit level. The lysine variant was used to compare the resolution of the different separation methods and showed a high resolving power for all separation methods tested. The different method selectivities were revealed by the monoglycosylation, which was found in the peak of the main variant with CEX and CIEF, while it was separated from the main peak with CZE. In combination with a comprehensive literature review, our results provide a complete overview of the current state of the methods with information on the advantages and limitations of each methodology.
单克隆抗体(mAb)电荷变体分析对于确保生物制药的质量至关重要,主要通过阳离子交换色谱法(CEX)、毛细管等电聚焦法(CIEF)或毛细管区带电泳法(CZE)进行。尽管所有方法的选择性各不相同,但mAb蛋白变体可在完整水平上进行定量,产生假象的风险较低。鉴定和表征可通过质谱(MS)进行,但由于使用了非挥发性成分,联用受到阻碍。在此,我们展示了CEX-MS、CIEF-MS和CZE-MS在完整水平上分析电荷变体的比较数据,并进行了全面综述。蛋白变体的分离通过在线紫外检测确认,随后进行在线MS联用。通过测量10种等电点(pI)为7.3至8.7的mAb对每种方法进行通用测试,而无需针对每种mAb单独调整方法参数。将这些方法和鉴定出的蛋白变体相互比较,并与之前发表的亚基水平的CZE-MS方法进行比较。赖氨酸变体用于比较不同分离方法的分辨率,结果表明所有测试的分离方法都具有较高的分辨率。单糖基化揭示了不同方法的选择性差异,在CEX和CIEF中,单糖基化出现在主要变体的峰中,而在CZE中,它与主峰分离。结合全面的文献综述,我们的结果全面概述了这些方法的当前状态,并提供了每种方法的优缺点信息。