Taflan Mehmet G, Akdeniz Sevda, Kusderci Hatice, Arslan Kübra, Ünal Mural, Süren Mustafa, Tulgar Serkan
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun University Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Kışla, Barış Avenue, No:199, Ilkadım, Samsun, 55090, Türkiye.
Bahçeşehir University, Göztepe Medical Park Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Türkiye.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03252-2.
We aimed to evaluate the effect of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia versus general anesthesia with an epidural catheter (GE) on the quality of postoperative recovery in abdominal hysterectomy patients. The recovery outcomes were assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale.
This prospective, single-center observational study included 87 female patients (aged 18-75 years). Their ASA physical status varied from I to III, and they had a planned elective abdominal hysterectomy scheduled. We divided them into two groups based on the type of anesthesia administered: the CSE group and the GE group. The primary outcome consisted of the total QoR-15 score we measured 24 h after the operation. Among the secondary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), analgesic consumption, pain scores assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the need for rescue analgesia, time to mobilization, hospitalization duration and the surgeon satisfaction score.
At 24 h post-surgery, the CSE group had a significantly higher QoR-15 score compared to that of the GE group, with scores of 131.97 ± 8.67 and 122.93 ± 13.41, respectively (p = 0.001). Additionally, the CSE group required less analgesic consumption, averaging 119.53 ± 33.16 ml compared to 149.32 ± 53.11 ml in the GE group (p = 0.002). The need for rescue analgesia was also lower in the CSE group, with 9.30% of patients requiring it compared to 27.27% in the GE group (p = 0.031). Furthermore, pain scores measured using the NRS and the PONV incidence were significantly lower in the CSE group during the first three hours after surgery (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the time to mobilization, length of hospital stays, or surgeon satisfaction scores between both groups.
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia provides a better quality of postoperative recovery for patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. This technique improves pain control, reduces the need for opioids, and minimizes nausea and vomiting. These findings suggest that combined spinal-epidural anesthesia may enhance patient comfort and well-being during recovery.
我们旨在评估腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉(CSE)与带硬膜外导管的全身麻醉(GE)对腹式子宫切除术患者术后恢复质量的影响。使用术后恢复质量-15(QoR-15)量表评估恢复结果。
这项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究纳入了87例女性患者(年龄18 - 75岁)。她们的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为I至III级,且计划进行择期腹式子宫切除术。我们根据所施行的麻醉类型将她们分为两组:CSE组和GE组。主要结局包括我们在术后24小时测量的QoR-15总分。次要结局包括术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率、镇痛药物用量、使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估的疼痛评分、补救镇痛的需求、活动时间、住院时间以及外科医生满意度评分。
术后24小时,CSE组的QoR-15评分显著高于GE组,分别为131.97±8.67分和122.93±13.41分(p = 0.001)。此外,CSE组的镇痛药物用量较少,平均为119.53±33.16毫升,而GE组为149.32±53.11毫升(p = 0.002)。CSE组补救镇痛的需求也较低,9.30%的患者需要补救镇痛,而GE组为27.27%(p = 0.031)。此外,术后前三小时使用NRS测量的疼痛评分以及CSE组的PONV发生率显著更低(p < 0.001)。然而,两组在活动时间、住院时长或外科医生满意度评分方面无显著差异。
腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉为接受腹式子宫切除术的患者提供了更好的术后恢复质量。该技术改善了疼痛控制,减少了阿片类药物的需求,并将恶心呕吐降至最低。这些发现表明,腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉可能会提高患者恢复期间的舒适度和幸福感。