Suppr超能文献

运用整合性实施框架探索糖尿病足筛查项目:快速综述方案

Exploring diabetic foot screening programs with integrated consolidated framework for implementation: Rapid review protocol.

作者信息

Blanchette Virginie, Fakhfakh Maya, Andoulsi Yassin, Brousseau-Foley Magali, Pallin Jennifer A, Buckley Claire, Drudi Laura M, de Mestral Charles, Kuhnke Janet L, McIntosh Caroline

机构信息

Department of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G8Z 4M3, Canada.

VITAM Center for Sustainable Health Research, Québec City, Québec, G1J 2G1, Canada.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2025 Apr 4;8:49. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14119.1. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU)s pose significant challenges for individuals with diabetes, leading to severe consequences, such as lower extremity amputations (LEA)s, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality. Disorganized diabetic foot care services contribute to health inequities worldwide, highlighting the need for structured preventive measures, which require an understanding of organizational and systemic components of the implementation of foot screening programs or initiatives, including equity factors. Thus, the (CFIR) is one of the most widely used frameworks for assessing these factors and contexts. This helps to reduce the risk of failure of implementation efforts in the real world and can help to support the scaling up of preventative measures. This review aims to analyze foot screening programs or initiatives for individuals at risk of DFUs and LEAs, define their key components and implementation determinants, identify barriers and facilitators, and describe effective implementation strategies in primary care with CFIR.

METHODS

A rapid review will be conducted following the Canadian method by Dobbins (2017) and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol guidelines. The research question is defined using the PICO framework. A systematic search will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE. Primary studies in English or French, including both primary study designs and knowledge syntheses, will be screened according to the defined eligibility criteria via Covidence. Study quality will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and data will be synthesized guided by the CFIR. Data synthesis will focus on implementation determinants, including barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies.

DISCUSSION

Findings will inform policy, practice and decision making regarding the implementation of screening programs. This can promote the development of screening programs for diabetic foot complications across Canada or in other countries.

摘要

背景

糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)给糖尿病患者带来了重大挑战,会导致严重后果,如下肢截肢(LEA)、生活质量下降和死亡率增加。杂乱无章的糖尿病足护理服务加剧了全球范围内的健康不平等,凸显了采取结构化预防措施的必要性,而这需要了解足部筛查项目或举措实施过程中的组织和系统组成部分,包括公平因素。因此,综合促进框架(CFIR)是评估这些因素和背景最广泛使用的框架之一。这有助于降低现实世界中实施工作失败的风险,并有助于支持扩大预防措施。本综述旨在分析针对有糖尿病足溃疡和下肢截肢风险个体的足部筛查项目或举措,确定其关键组成部分和实施决定因素,识别障碍和促进因素,并描述在初级保健中运用CFIR的有效实施策略。

方法

将按照多宾斯(2017年)的加拿大方法进行快速综述,并根据系统评价和Meta分析优先报告项目协议指南进行报告。研究问题使用PICO框架进行定义。将在MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE中进行系统检索。将通过Covidence根据定义的纳入标准筛选英语或法语的主要研究,包括主要研究设计和知识综合。将使用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量,并在CFIR的指导下进行数据综合。数据综合将侧重于实施决定因素,包括障碍、促进因素和实施策略。

讨论

研究结果将为筛查项目实施的政策、实践和决策提供信息。这可以促进加拿大或其他国家糖尿病足并发症筛查项目的发展。

相似文献

1
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
7
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
8
Psychological interventions for treating foot ulcers, and preventing their recurrence, in people with diabetes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 8;2(2):CD012835. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012835.pub2.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating and mapping the evidence that screening for diabetic foot disease meets the criteria for population-wide screening: a scoping review.
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;2(1):e000561. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000561. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Implementation of evidence-based foot screening in people with diabetes: A scoping review.
J Diabetes Complications. 2025 Mar;39(3):108972. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2025.108972. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
3
Effectiveness of screening for foot complications in people with diabetes - A systematic review.
J Diabetes Complications. 2024 Nov;38(11):108865. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108865. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
4
Geographic Variation in First Lower Extremity Amputations Related to Diabetes and/or Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Can J Cardiol. 2024 Dec;40(12):2606-2615. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
The Final Frontier in Diabetes Care: Implementing Research in Real-World Practice.
Diabetes Care. 2024 Aug 1;47(8):1299-1310. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0001.
9
Diabetic foot complications among Indigenous peoples in Canada: a scoping review through the equity lens.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 14;14:1177020. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1177020. eCollection 2023.
10
Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review.
Implement Sci. 2023 Jul 25;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验