Ghanem Laura, Kirmani Najwaa, Palacios-Ortiz María Paula, Cevallos-Cueva Martin, Mendoza-Millán Daniela Lucía, Almeida Nascimento Gabriel Victor, Velasco-Tamariz Virginia
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 21;12:1631087. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1631087. eCollection 2025.
Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common hair loss disease, caused by a combination of genetic factors and hormonal imbalances. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has gained significant recognition in treating AGA, but optimal treatment protocol regarding centrifugation techniques has yet to reach a standardized consensus. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of single-spin versus double-spin centrifugation protocols for PRP in patients with AGA.
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for RCTs comparing single-spin to double-spin PRP in AGA patients. The primary endpoint was the final platelets count after centrifugation. Secondary endpoints included improvement in hair density, as well as terminal and vellus hair rate. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio software. Heterogeneity was assessed with statistics.
We included 90 participants with AGA from three RCTs. The pooled mean difference (MD) for platelets concentration was 66.14 in single-spin compared to double-spin PRP (95% CI: -372.96 to 505.25; = 0.77; = 83.5%). The MD for change in hair density was 4.10% in single versus double-spin (95% CI: -4.74 to 12.93; = 0.36; = 0%). Moreover, the MD for terminal and vellus hair after single-spin versus double-spin PRP was 1.16 (95% CI: -3.34 to 5.66; = 0.61; = 0%), and -3.59 (95% CI: -12.49 to 5.30; = 0.45; = 4.8%), respectively.
Our study suggests that single-spin PRP centrifugation is better in treating AGA patients compared to double-spin PRP.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025643296, identifier CRD42025643296.
雄激素性脱发(AGA)是最常见的脱发疾病,由遗传因素和激素失衡共同引起。富血小板血浆(PRP)疗法在治疗AGA方面已获得广泛认可,但关于离心技术的最佳治疗方案尚未达成标准化共识。我们旨在对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较单旋与双旋离心方案制备的PRP对AGA患者的疗效。
我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中检索比较单旋与双旋PRP治疗AGA患者的RCT。主要终点是离心后的最终血小板计数。次要终点包括头发密度的改善以及终毛和毳毛率。使用RStudio软件进行统计分析。用I²统计量评估异质性。
我们纳入了来自三项RCT的90例AGA患者。与双旋PRP相比,单旋PRP的血小板浓度合并平均差(MD)为66.14(95%CI:-372.96至505.25;I² = 0.77;P = 83.5%)。单旋与双旋PRP相比,头发密度变化的MD为4.10%(95%CI:-4.74至12.93;I² = 0.36;P = 0%)。此外,单旋与双旋PRP后终毛和毳毛的MD分别为1.16(95%CI:-3.34至5.66;I² = 0.61;P = 0%)和-3.59(95%CI:-12.49至5.30;I² = 0.45;P = 4.8%)。
我们的研究表明,与双旋PRP相比,单旋PRP离心在治疗AGA患者方面效果更好。
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025643296,标识符CRD42025643296。