Kemp Mackenzie, Beachy Sara, Martin Karla, Worster Brooke, Hass Richard W, Olarewaju Iyaniwura, Berkowitz Seth, Rising Kristin L
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of North Carolina System, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025 Jan 3;8(1):e001084. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001084. eCollection 2025.
Malnutrition and food insecurity are common challenges among patients with cancer. Nutrition interventions can support patient nutrition needs and quality of life during cancer treatment, though measures to assess impact of interventions are lacking. In prior work, our team developed a Nutrition Experience Survey to assess patient-important domains related to impact of nutrition interventions during cancer treatment, from which a 9-item food-related and nutrition-related quality-of-life (FN-QoL) measure emerged. In this work, we report results from administering the overall Nutrition Experience Survey, including the FN-QoL measure, to a sample of patients with cancer and present initial validity testing of the FN-QoL measure.
This is a cross-sectional survey study in which we administered the Nutrition Experience Survey to a convenience sample of English-speaking patients with cancer in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Survey responses were summarised with descriptive statistics. Validity and internal consistency of the FN-QoL measure were evaluated with bivariate correlation matrices and Cronbach's alpha followed by a multiple linear regression analysis.
117 individuals completed the survey: mean age 62 (21-90), 49.6% white, 58.3% women. Cronbach's alpha confirmed adequate internal consistency (0.856) for the FN-QoL. The bivariate correlation matrix indicated that the FN-QoL was correlated with items as expected (eg, poorer subject health ratings, =-0.48, p<0.001 and nutrition self-efficacy, =0.38, p<0.05). Multiple linear regression found that receipt of medically tailored meals and treatment-related symptoms were related to FN-QoL when adjusting for all other variables.
Results suggest validity and potential utility of the FN-QoL measure to assess impact of food and nutrition interventions on quality of life among patients with cancer. Future work should assess applicability of this tool across populations who do not have cancer and sensitivity of this measure to change over time related to receipt of nutrition interventions.
营养不良和粮食不安全是癌症患者常见的挑战。营养干预可以满足患者在癌症治疗期间的营养需求并提高生活质量,不过目前缺乏评估干预措施效果的方法。在之前的工作中,我们团队开发了一项营养体验调查,以评估与癌症治疗期间营养干预效果相关的、对患者重要的领域,由此产生了一项包含9个项目的食物与营养相关生活质量(FN-QoL)测量指标。在这项研究中,我们报告了对一组癌症患者进行整体营养体验调查(包括FN-QoL测量指标)的结果,并展示了FN-QoL测量指标的初步效度测试。
这是一项横断面调查研究,我们对宾夕法尼亚州费城讲英语的癌症患者便利样本进行了营养体验调查。调查结果用描述性统计进行总结。通过双变量相关矩阵和克朗巴哈系数评估FN-QoL测量指标的效度和内部一致性,随后进行多元线性回归分析。
117人完成了调查:平均年龄62岁(21 - 90岁),49.6%为白人,58.3%为女性。克朗巴哈系数证实FN-QoL具有足够的内部一致性(0.856)。双变量相关矩阵表明,FN-QoL与预期项目相关(例如,较差的主观健康评分,r = -0.48,p < 0.001;营养自我效能,r = 0.38,p < 0.05)。多元线性回归发现,在对所有其他变量进行调整后,接受医学定制餐和与治疗相关的症状与FN-QoL相关。
结果表明FN-QoL测量指标在评估食物和营养干预对癌症患者生活质量的影响方面具有效度和潜在效用。未来的工作应评估该工具在非癌症人群中的适用性,以及该测量指标对与接受营养干预相关的随时间变化的敏感性。