Cheng Jia-Jun, Dai Zhang-Yi, Wang Fu-Qiang, Zhang Han-Lu, Pu Qiang, Wang Yun
Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17871-z.
Lobectomy (LOB) remains the standard treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), though sublobar resection (SLR) has emerged as a potential alternative with comparable outcomes. Spread through air spaces (STAS) has been confirmed as an independent risk factor after lung cancer surgery. The prognosis differences between LOB and SLR in patients with stage I NSCLC with STAS are controversial.
After systematic retrieval across multiple databases, 25 eligible studies involving 14,126 patients were identified. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing lobectomy versus sublobar resection, along with reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) records. These datasets were subsequently subjected to meta-analysis with complementary subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
STAS was confirmed as an independent risk factor (RFS: HR 2.61, 95% CI 2.17-3.14; OS: HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.75-2.63). In subgroup analysis of SLR versus LOB in patients with STAS, the inferior RFS and comparable OS were observed in the SLR group (RFS: HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.16-2.49, n = 3488; OS: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.83-1.46, n = 3581). Furthermore, ACT following SLR effectively reduced recurrence risk in STAS-positive patients compared with LOB (LOB: RFS: HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.48-2.22; SLR: RFS: HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.82).
Surgical approach significantly impacts survival outcomes in stage I NSCLC patients with STAS. LOB remains the preferred option due to its lower recurrence rate and prolonged survival outcomes; for high-risk patients undergoing SLR, ACT is recommended in the case of postoperative STAS.
肺叶切除术(LOB)仍是 I 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方法,尽管肺段切除术(SLR)已成为一种具有可比疗效的潜在替代方案。气腔播散(STAS)已被确认为肺癌手术后的独立危险因素。I 期 NSCLC 伴 STAS 患者中 LOB 和 SLR 的预后差异存在争议。
在对多个数据库进行系统检索后,确定了 25 项符合条件的研究,涉及 14126 名患者。我们提取了比较肺叶切除术与肺段切除术的无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(HRs),以及重建的个体患者数据(IPD)和辅助化疗(ACT)记录。随后对这些数据集进行荟萃分析,并进行补充亚组分析和敏感性分析。
STAS 被确认为独立危险因素(RFS:HR 2.61,95%CI 2.17 - 3.14;OS:HR 2.15,95%CI 1.75 - 2.63)。在 STAS 患者中 SLR 与 LOB 的亚组分析中,SLR 组观察到较差的 RFS 和相当的 OS(RFS:HR 1.70,95%CI 1.16 - 2.49,n = 3488;OS:HR 1.10,95%CI 0.83 - 1.46,n = 3581)。此外,与 LOB 相比,SLR 后的 ACT 有效降低了 STAS 阳性患者的复发风险(LOB:RFS:HR 1.03,95%CI 0.48 - 2.22;SLR:RFS:HR 0.44,95%CI 0.23 - 0.82)。
手术方式对 I 期 NSCLC 伴 STAS 患者的生存结局有显著影响。由于其较低的复发率和延长的生存结局,LOB 仍然是首选方案;对于接受 SLR 的高危患者,术后出现 STAS 时建议进行 ACT。