Brown Claire, Hartley Peter, Forsyth Faye, Boehm Leanne M, Martin Graham, Kuhn Isla, Pattison Natalie, Connolly Bronwen, Lone Nazir, Danesh Valerie, McPeake Joanne
Cambridge University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08072-z.
Family members of critically ill patients are known to experience short and longer term challenges, including emotional and social problems. To undertake robust future interventional research to support this cohort, we undertook a comprehensive evaluation of the measures used in family outcome research to date.
Scoping review. We searched Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science (core collection) for articles published between 2000 and 2024 which examined the outcomes of family members of critically ill patients. Data on outcome measures, study design, and population characteristics were extracted from eligible studies.
We reviewed 9873 abstracts and identified 388 eligible unique family member cohorts. Across these studies, there were 59 (15.2%) randomised control trials, 287 (74.0%) observational cohorts, 8 (2.1%) quality improvement programmes, and 34 (8.8%) non-randomised controlled interventional studies. Most research was undertaken in USA, Canada, and Europe (n = 264, 67.5%). A total of 218 different outcomes measures were used across the studies included. In this review, 345 (89%) studies measured emotional or psychological outcomes, 85 (22%) measured family experience outcomes, 65 (17%) measured general functional status, quality of life or well-being outcomes, 35 (9%) measured environmental or social outcomes, and 10 (3%) measured cognitive outcomes.
We identified 388 studies which reported the outcomes of family members of critically ill patients. Over 200 different outcomes measures were utilised, exploring conceptual domains such as quality of life as well as psychological and social outcomes. The majority of studies were observational in nature with variable follow-up timelines. This review has highlighted that a core outcome measure set is essential to enable reliable, robust, and comparable interventional research in this area.
众所周知,重症患者的家庭成员会经历短期和长期的挑战,包括情感和社会问题。为了开展强有力的未来干预研究以支持这一群体,我们对迄今为止家庭结局研究中使用的测量方法进行了全面评估。
范围综述。我们在Medline、PsycINFO、Scopus、CINAHL和Web of Science(核心合集)中检索了2000年至2024年发表的研究重症患者家庭成员结局的文章。从符合条件的研究中提取了关于结局测量、研究设计和人群特征的数据。
我们审查了9873篇摘要,确定了388个符合条件的独特家庭成员队列。在这些研究中,有59项(15.2%)随机对照试验、287项(74.0%)观察性队列研究、8项(2.1%)质量改进项目和34项(8.8%)非随机对照干预研究。大多数研究在美国、加拿大和欧洲进行(n = 264,67.5%)。纳入的研究共使用了218种不同的结局测量方法。在本综述中,345项(89%)研究测量了情感或心理结局,85项(22%)测量了家庭体验结局,65项(17%)测量了一般功能状态、生活质量或幸福感结局,35项(9%)测量了环境或社会结局,10项(3%)测量了认知结局。
我们确定了388项报告重症患者家庭成员结局的研究。使用了200多种不同的结局测量方法,探索了生活质量以及心理和社会结局等概念领域。大多数研究本质上是观察性的,随访时间各不相同。本综述强调,一套核心结局测量指标对于在该领域开展可靠、有力且可比的干预研究至关重要。