Wang Mingyu, Chang David, Singh Aditya, Wagner Jeff, Wang Zhong-Min, Singer Brett C, Miller Shelly L, Martinez Nayamin, Rodriguez Ruben, Kaser Isabella, Thompson McKenna, Heidarinejad Mohammad, Stephens Brent, Solomon Gina
Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Alumni Memorial Hall Room 228, 3201 S Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60616 USA.
Tracking California, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA USA.
Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2025;25(8):47. doi: 10.1007/s44408-025-00048-4. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
Low-cost particle monitors have been widely evaluated in laboratory and ambient monitoring settings, but we have less knowledge about their performance for long-term indoor and outdoor monitoring in residential settings. We seek to provide practical guidance for using a type of low-cost particle monitors that have become widespread for indoor and outdoor monitoring in community field studies, PurpleAir PA-II monitors. We base our insights on experiences in a community-led residential field study in and around homes of predominantly agricultural workers in California's San Joaquin Valley. Our guidance spans three categories: (1) providing tools for handling and merging disparate data structures resulting from Wi-Fi-transmitted data and data collected on onboard microSD cards, (2) assessing performance metrics of PA-II monitors from laboratory co-location and field measurements, and (3) assessing data collection success rates of Wi-Fi data transmission and microSD card data acquisition from our study locations. The post-processing methods we demonstrate can successfully align data from both Wi-Fi transmission and microSD cards. Laboratory co-location measurements demonstrated that > 90% of the tested monitors performed well relative to each other (high precision), with only a few problematic monitors that warranted further investigation or exclusion from use. The application of co-location factors generated using the mean of all co-located monitors as a reference did not significantly affect distributions of field-measured indoor or outdoor PM concentrations. Relying solely on Wi-Fi data transmission in our study would have resulted in large data loss (i.e., < 50% success rate); using microSD card storage with PA-II-SD monitors increased the data collection success rate to over 80% in these settings. This work contributes to the growing body of knowledge on low-cost particle sensor performance and usability.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44408-025-00048-4.
低成本颗粒物监测仪已在实验室和环境监测环境中得到广泛评估,但我们对其在住宅环境中长期室内和室外监测的性能了解较少。我们旨在为一种在社区实地研究中广泛用于室内和室外监测的低成本颗粒物监测仪——PurpleAir PA-II监测仪的使用提供实用指南。我们的见解基于加利福尼亚州圣华金谷主要农业工人家庭及其周边社区主导的住宅实地研究经验。我们的指南涵盖三个类别:(1)提供工具以处理和合并由Wi-Fi传输数据和板载微型SD卡收集的数据所产生的不同数据结构;(2)通过实验室共置和现场测量评估PA-II监测仪的性能指标;(3)评估我们研究地点的Wi-Fi数据传输和微型SD卡数据采集的数据收集成功率。我们展示的后处理方法可以成功对齐来自Wi-Fi传输和微型SD卡的数据。实验室共置测量表明,超过90%的测试监测仪相互之间表现良好(高精度),只有少数有问题的监测仪需要进一步调查或排除使用。以所有共置监测仪的平均值作为参考生成的共置因子的应用,对现场测量的室内或室外PM浓度分布没有显著影响。在我们的研究中仅依靠Wi-Fi数据传输会导致大量数据丢失(即成功率低于50%);在这些设置中,使用PA-II-SD监测仪的微型SD卡存储将数据收集成功率提高到了80%以上。这项工作有助于增加关于低成本颗粒物传感器性能和可用性的知识。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s44408-025-00048-4获取的补充材料。