Suppr超能文献

平均动脉压升高能否改善钝性脊髓损伤的神经功能恢复:一项东部创伤外科学会多中心试验

Does mean arterial pressure augmentation improve neurological recovery of blunt spinal cord injuries: an EAST multicenter trial.

作者信息

LaRiccia Aimee, Doris Stephanie, Shah Bhairav, Kashikar Tanisha, Teicher Erik, Perea Lindsey, Huber Jennifer, Eischen Malia, Erol H Akin, Farrell Michael Steven, Colom Lauren, Scott Stephanie, Daley Brian, Bardes James, Schaefer Gregory, Moncrief Melissa, DeVoe William, Dumas Ryan Peter, Fitzgerald Caitlin Anne, Brigode William, Berne John D, Mederos Dalier R, Armen Scott, Linskey Dougherty Melissa, Ratnasekera Asanthi, Alberto Emily, Smith Alison, Dennis Bradley M, Gadomski Stephen, Nahmias Jeffry, Alvarez Claudia, Wydo Salina, Schweinsburg Jennifer, Palacio Carlos H, Spalding M Chance, Hill Joshua

机构信息

OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Aug 17;10(3):e001768. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001768. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of blunt traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) often includes maintaining elevated mean arterial blood pressures (MAP) to enhance perfusion to the spinal cord. Optimal hyperperfusion protocols and treatment algorithms have yet to be delineated due to a paucity of large volume prospective studies. This study aims to identify predictors of neurological improvement in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score following blunt SCI.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective (January 10, 2021 to June 1, 2023) multicenter study included blunt SCI patients age >18 with complete neurological examination documented on hospital arrival. Patients were divided into two groups: neurological improvement and no improvement, based on their change in ASIA score from arrival to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 19 centers contributed 222 patients of those, 164 had pre-ASIA and post-ASIA scores. The ASIA improvement group had 36 patients (22%). There was no statistical difference in the median percentage of time patients spent at a MAP >85 mm Hg during treatment 80.7% (IQR 63.6, 93.4) no improvement vs 83.6% (IQR 70.1, 93.0) in the improvement, (p=0.87). There was no difference in the median duration of MAP treatment in hours between the groups (95.6 hours (IQR 62.55, 113.48) in the no improvement group versus 96 (IQR 72, 113.5) (p=0.40) in the improvement group).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 22% of all blunt SCI patients saw an improvement in their ASIA score. Adherence to and length of MAP augmentation was not a statistically significantly different between groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV Therapeutic/Care Management.

摘要

背景

钝性创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)的治疗通常包括维持较高的平均动脉血压(MAP)以增强脊髓灌注。由于缺乏大量前瞻性研究,最佳的过度灌注方案和治疗算法尚未明确。本研究旨在确定钝性SCI后美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤评分神经功能改善的预测因素。

研究设计

前瞻性(2021年1月10日至2023年6月1日)多中心研究纳入年龄>18岁、入院时神经系统检查完整的钝性SCI患者。根据患者入院至出院时ASIA评分的变化,将患者分为两组:神经功能改善组和无改善组。

结果

共有19个中心贡献了222例患者,其中164例有ASIA评分前和评分后数据。ASIA改善组有36例患者(22%)。治疗期间患者MAP>85 mmHg的中位时间百分比在无改善组为80.7%(四分位间距63.6,93.4),改善组为83.6%(四分位间距70.1,93.0),两者无统计学差异(p=0.87)。两组间MAP治疗的中位小时数无差异(无改善组为95.6小时(四分位间距62.55,113.48),改善组为96小时(四分位间距72,113.5),p=0.40)。

结论

总体而言,所有钝性SCI患者中有22%的ASIA评分有所改善。两组间MAP升高的依从性和持续时间在统计学上无显著差异。

证据水平

IV级治疗/护理管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e0/12359463/9dd0b30da010/tsaco-10-3-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验