Suppr超能文献

全科医生在初级保健中进行同步远程会诊的经验:一项混合方法的系统评价。

General practitioners' experience about synchronous teleconsultation in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review.

作者信息

Sowanou Alphonse, Morillon Gabin F, Guillon Marlène, Poder Thomas G, Laberge Maude

机构信息

Faculty of nursing sciences, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2025 Aug 25;26(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02975-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

General practitioners (GPs) extensively used synchronous teleconsultation (STC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although this utilization decreased after the state of sanitary emergency was lifted, it remains higher than pre-pandemic levels.

METHODS

The aim is to summarize the scientific evidence on the factors influencing GPs’ decision to conduct STC instead of face-to-face consultation. We conducted a systematic review and reported our results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. We searched four electronic databases: MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing Literature and allied health, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and conducted the last search on March 23, 2023. Two independent reviewers selected English/French articles reporting on GPs’ use, attitude, satisfaction, and experience with STC. We assessed the studies’ quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and a narrative approach was performed to synthesize findings.

RESULTS

The screening of 9,288 references resulted in the inclusion of 34 studies, for a total of 5,563 participants. Results show that GPs’ decision to use STC is influenced by six categories of factors: (1) consultation, such as consultation purpose (e.g., follow-up care, administrative requests); (2) information and communication technology, such as quality of equipment and bandwidth (internet connection and the effectiveness of the hardware and software); (3) GP, such as convenience (the flexibility offered by the STC); (4) patient, such as access barriers (ex., physical, geographical, financial); (5) GP-patient relationship, such as ease of diagnosis; and (6) the institution, such as organizational and peer support. Lack of a reliable internet connection, need for physical exams, and limited visual cues were the main barriers to using STC.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs’ utilization of STC depends on the interplay of six categories of factors, the most important being the purpose of consultation. Equity in access and a fair payment model are key elements to consider in designing health policies aimed at supporting adoption and appropriate use of STC.

REVIEW’S PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024505744

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-025-02975-y.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,全科医生(GP)广泛使用同步远程会诊(STC)。尽管在卫生紧急状态解除后,这种使用有所减少,但仍高于疫情前的水平。

方法

目的是总结关于影响全科医生决定进行同步远程会诊而非面对面会诊的因素的科学证据。我们按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行了系统评价并报告结果。我们检索了四个电子数据库:医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,并于2023年3月23日进行了最后一次检索。两名独立评审员筛选了报告全科医生对同步远程会诊的使用、态度、满意度和体验的英文/法文文章。我们使用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量,并采用叙述性方法综合研究结果。

结果

对9288篇参考文献进行筛选后,纳入了34项研究,共5563名参与者。结果表明,全科医生决定使用同步远程会诊受六类因素影响:(1)会诊,如会诊目的(如随访、行政要求);(2)信息和通信技术,如设备质量和带宽(互联网连接以及硬件和软件的有效性);(3)全科医生,如便利性(同步远程会诊提供的灵活性);(4)患者,如获取障碍(如身体、地理、经济方面);(5)医患关系,如诊断的难易程度;(6)机构,如组织和同行支持。缺乏可靠的互联网连接、需要进行体格检查以及视觉线索有限是使用同步远程会诊的主要障碍。

结论

全科医生对同步远程会诊的使用取决于六类因素的相互作用,其中最重要的是会诊目的。在设计旨在支持同步远程会诊的采用和适当使用的卫生政策时,公平获取和公平支付模式是需要考虑的关键要素。

综述方案注册

PROSPERO CRD42024505744

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12875-025-02975-y获取的补充材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验