Lane Rebecca M, Egan Laurence J, McGuire Brian E, McKernan Declan P, O'Mahony Siobhain M, Finn David P
Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Centre for Pain Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
HRB Open Res. 2025 Jul 23;8:40. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14082.2. eCollection 2025.
Visceral Pain is a common debilitating symptom of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a prime target for alleviation of visceral pain, given its important role in both gastrointestinal physiology and pain. We will conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of cannabis, cannabinoids, cannabis-based medicines (CBMs), and other ECS modulators for patients with IBD and IBS, comparing any preparation of cannabis, any cannabinoid, CBM, or other pharmacological modulator of the ECS (any dose, by any route of administration), with any control (placebo, or pharmacological / psychological / dietary intervention). We will search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, as well as the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov Trials Registries, together with reference checking and citation searching, following PRISMA guidelines. Our objectives are to evaluate the benefits and harms of pharmacological modulation of the ECS for visceral abdominal pain in patients with IBD or IBS, compared to placebo or other interventions. The primary outcomes will be the proportion of people with (a) at least a 30% reduction and (b) at least a 50% reduction in pain. Secondary outcomes will include any change in pain intensity, physical and emotional functioning, fatigue and sleep measures, quality of life, gastrointestinal disease or symptom severity, and adverse effects. We will assess risk of bias in the RCTs using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Where there are sufficient data that are directly comparable, we will conduct meta-analyses of the results for each outcome. We will use the GRADEpro GDT tool to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. This review will synthesise the available evidence regarding all types of ECS modulation for the treatment of visceral abdominal pain and its related comorbidities in IBS and IBD patients.
内脏痛是炎症性肠病(IBD)和肠易激综合征(IBS)常见的使人衰弱的症状。鉴于内源性大麻素系统(ECS)在胃肠生理学和疼痛方面都具有重要作用,它是缓解内脏痛的主要靶点。我们将对大麻、大麻素、大麻类药物(CBM)以及其他用于IBD和IBS患者的ECS调节剂的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价,将任何大麻制剂、任何大麻素、CBM或其他ECS的药理学调节剂(任何剂量、任何给药途径)与任何对照(安慰剂或药理学/心理/饮食干预)进行比较。我们将按照PRISMA指南,检索CENTRAL、MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE和科学网数据库,以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台和ClinicalTrials.gov试验注册库,并进行参考文献核对和引文检索。我们的目标是评估与安慰剂或其他干预措施相比,ECS药理学调节对IBD或IBS患者内脏腹痛的益处和危害。主要结局将是疼痛(a)至少减轻30%和(b)至少减轻50%的患者比例。次要结局将包括疼痛强度、身体和情绪功能、疲劳和睡眠指标、生活质量、胃肠疾病或症状严重程度以及不良反应的任何变化。我们将使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估RCT中的偏倚风险。在有足够直接可比数据的情况下,我们将对每个结局的结果进行荟萃分析。我们将使用GRADEpro GDT工具评估每个结局证据的确定性。本综述将综合关于所有类型ECS调节用于治疗IBS和IBD患者内脏腹痛及其相关合并症的现有证据。