Chen Shaoru, Wang Jie, Zhi Hui, Zhang Hongmei
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Zhengzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1551222. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1551222. eCollection 2025.
To assess efficacy and implement the best available evidence for managing and preventing alarm fatigue in a healthcare context.
Four phases of evidence acquisition, status review, evidence application, and effect evaluation were used to apply evidence-based practice to medical care in the PACU between January and June 2024. Prior to and following the application of evidence, the occurrence of unfavorable outcomes pertaining to the management of surgical patient monitors and anesthesia alarm reports, the degree of evidence-based organizational culture, the implementation rate of review indicators, and the associated knowledge level of alarm fatigue prevention and management were all compared.
Following the implementation of evidence-based practice, the indicators related to Anesthesiologists and nurses were reviewed, and the implementation rate was improved compared with the baseline. The frequency of negative outcomes associated with surgical patient monitoring and anesthesia alarm management was considerably decreased. Anesthesiology physicians' and nurses' knowledge of alarm fatigue management (t = -7.027, < 0.001) and evidence-based practice skills (t = -52.804, < 0.001) improved. The degree of evidence-based organizational culture was higher than baseline (t = -23.864, < 0.001), while clinical alarm fatigue (t = 37.454, < 0.001) and barriers to evidence-based nursing practice (t = 41.508, < 0.001) were lower than baseline.
Continuous quality improvement is still required in subsequent clinical settings, but evidence-based practice in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine can effectively standardize the alarm practice behaviors of healthcare professionals, enhance evidence-based competence, and lower the incidence of patient-related adverse events in alarm management.
评估在医疗环境中管理和预防警报疲劳的有效性,并应用最佳现有证据。
采用证据收集、现状审查、证据应用和效果评估四个阶段,于2024年1月至6月将循证实践应用于麻醉后监护病房(PACU)的医疗护理中。在证据应用前后,比较手术患者监护仪管理和麻醉警报报告相关不良结局的发生率、循证组织文化程度、审查指标的执行率以及警报疲劳预防和管理的相关知识水平。
实施循证实践后,对麻醉医生和护士相关指标进行了审查,执行率较基线有所提高。与手术患者监护和麻醉警报管理相关的负面结局频率显著降低。麻醉医生和护士对警报疲劳管理的知识(t = -7.027,P < 0.001)和循证实践技能(t = -52.804,P < 0.001)有所提高。循证组织文化程度高于基线(t = -23.864,P < 0.001),而临床警报疲劳(t = 37.454,P < 0.001)和循证护理实践障碍(t = 41.508,P < 0.001)低于基线。
后续临床环境仍需持续质量改进,但麻醉学与围手术期医学科的循证实践可有效规范医护人员的警报实践行为,提高循证能力,降低警报管理中与患者相关不良事件的发生率。