Yao Sen, Hu Jian
Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
J Affect Disord. 2026 Jan 15;393(Pt A):120302. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120302. Epub 2025 Sep 17.
The demethylation is suspected to play a role in the development of major depressive disorder (MDD), but the precise biological mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate biomarkers linked to demethylation in MDD by integrating bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq) data and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) data.
The bulk RNA-seq data and snRNA-seq data for MDD were sourced from public databases, and the demethylation-related genes (DRGs) were extracted from the literature. Employing differential expression analysis, machine learning algorithms, and expression profiling, this study identified biomarkers. Afterward, biomarkers were incorporated into a nomogram. The study explored underlying biological mechanisms through enrichment and immune infiltration analyses, while deciphering the regulatory networks of biomarkers. Subsequent analyses included the prediction of targeted drugs, molecular docking, and the examination of the expression of these biomarkers at the single-nucleus level, followed by the identification of key cells and pseudo-time analysis of these cells. Eventually, the expression of biomarkers was clinically validated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
AREG and NR4A1 were identified as biomarkers, all exhibiting down-regulated expression in MDD samples. Furthermore, the nomogram demonstrated satisfactory clinical utility for assessing MDD probability. Enrichment analysis indicated that biomarkers might affect the occurrence of MDD through "oxidative phosphorylation". Moreover, 6 types of immune infiltrating cells showed significant differences between MDD and control samples. Also, the regulatory networks were constructed, identifying the potential regulators of the biomarkers. The drugs were predicted, and the molecular docking illustrated that a robust binding interaction was found between AREG and dinoprost, with a binding energy of -84.0 kcal/mol. Additionally, snRNA-seq analysis identified 6 cell types, with excitatory neuron (EX) cells were identified as the key cells, and the expression levels of biomarkers exhibited dynamic and nonlinear changes during the differentiation of EX cells.
AREG and NR4A1, which were related to demethylation, were identified as biomarkers in MDD, providing a new perspective to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying MDD.
脱甲基作用被怀疑在重度抑郁症(MDD)的发生发展中起作用,但确切的生物学机制仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在通过整合批量RNA测序(bulk RNA-seq)数据和单核RNA测序(snRNA-seq)数据,研究与MDD中脱甲基作用相关的生物标志物。
MDD的批量RNA-seq数据和snRNA-seq数据来源于公共数据库,脱甲基相关基因(DRGs)从文献中提取。本研究采用差异表达分析、机器学习算法和表达谱分析来识别生物标志物。随后,将生物标志物纳入列线图。该研究通过富集和免疫浸润分析探索潜在的生物学机制,同时解析生物标志物的调控网络。后续分析包括靶向药物预测、分子对接,以及在单核水平检测这些生物标志物的表达,随后识别关键细胞并对这些细胞进行伪时间分析。最终,使用逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)对生物标志物的表达进行临床验证。
AREG和NR4A1被鉴定为生物标志物,在MDD样本中均表现出表达下调。此外,列线图在评估MDD概率方面显示出令人满意的临床实用性。富集分析表明,生物标志物可能通过“氧化磷酸化”影响MDD的发生。此外,6种免疫浸润细胞在MDD样本和对照样本之间存在显著差异。同时,构建了调控网络,确定了生物标志物的潜在调节因子。进行了药物预测,分子对接表明AREG与地诺前列素之间存在强大的结合相互作用,结合能为-84.0千卡/摩尔。此外,snRNA-seq分析识别出6种细胞类型,其中兴奋性神经元(EX)细胞被确定为关键细胞,并且生物标志物的表达水平在EX细胞分化过程中呈现动态和非线性变化。
与脱甲基作用相关的AREG和NR4A1被鉴定为MDD中的生物标志物,为理解MDD潜在的分子机制提供了新的视角。