Daya S, Gunby J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Reprod Immunol. 1994 Dec;32(4):294-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1994.tb01129.x.
Unexplained primary recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) can be viewed as a partner-specific problem for which immunization with allogeneic leukocytes is being offered as therapy. Published data from randomized controlled trials have produced conflicting results regarding treatment effectiveness. The aim of this study was to perform a subgroup analysis of the data from a recent worldwide collaborative meta-analysis using the raw data for patients with primary RSA entered into randomized controlled trials of immunotherapy.
Data from randomized controlled trials in eight centers were included in this analysis. Individual patients were included only if they had had three or more spontaneous abortions, no previous pregnancy beyond 20 weeks' gestation, no identifiable cause for the abortions, and no evidence of antipaternal antibodies. Meta-analysis by centre and logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the overall effect of treatment in achieving live birth and to identify variables that affect the prognosis for a successful outcome.
In the meta-analysis by center, immunotherapy significantly improved the live birth rate (common odds ratio = 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.20 to 3.12). In the analysis by patient, the likelihood of a successful outcome was also significantly better with treatment (relative risk = 1.46, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.69). The absolute treatment effect was 16.3% producing a number needed to treat of 6. The number of previous abortions had a significant negative correlation with live birth rate, such that for each additional pregnancy loss beyond three, the likelihood of live birth was reduced by 23%.
Allogeneic leukocyte immunization is an effective treatment for unexplained primary RSA when pretreatment antipaternal antibodies are absent. Better diagnostic tests are required to identify patients who may derive maximal benefit from this therapeutic approach.
不明原因的原发性复发性自然流产(RSA)可被视为一种与伴侣相关的问题,针对这一问题,目前正在采用同种异体白细胞免疫疗法进行治疗。随机对照试验的已发表数据在治疗效果方面产生了相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是使用纳入免疫疗法随机对照试验的原发性RSA患者的原始数据,对近期一项全球合作的荟萃分析数据进行亚组分析。
本分析纳入了八个中心的随机对照试验数据。仅纳入那些有三次或更多次自然流产、既往妊娠未超过20周、流产无明确原因且无抗父系抗体证据的个体患者。进行中心荟萃分析和逻辑回归分析,以确定治疗在实现活产方面的总体效果,并确定影响成功结局预后的变量。
在中心荟萃分析中,免疫疗法显著提高了活产率(共同比值比 = 1.94,95%置信区间(CI) = 1.20至3.12)。在患者分析中,治疗组成功结局的可能性也显著更高(相对风险 = 1.46,95%CI 1.19至1.69)。绝对治疗效果为16.3%,治疗所需人数为6。既往流产次数与活产率呈显著负相关,即每多一次超过三次的妊娠丢失,活产的可能性降低23%。
当不存在预处理抗父系抗体时,同种异体白细胞免疫疗法是不明原因原发性RSA的有效治疗方法。需要更好的诊断测试来识别可能从这种治疗方法中获得最大益处的患者。