Sutherland J C, Fisk D J, Monteleone D C, Trunk J G
Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, 11973, USA.
Anal Biochem. 1996 Aug 1;239(2):136-44. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0308.
Finish-line imaging, in which DNA or other macromolecules are detected after electrophoresis for a constant distance, usually improves resolution compared to snapshot imaging, in which molecules are electrophoresed for a constant time in an apparatus of comparable dimensions. Resolving power, which is an objective measure of the ability of different separatory methods to detect closely spaced molecular species, can be used to compare directly the performance of systems employing both snapshot and finish-line imaging [E. A. Ribeiro and J. C. Sutherland, Anal. Biochem. 210, 378-388 (1993)]. Experimentally determined values of resolving power are influenced both by the method of imaging (snapshot vs finish-line) and by instrument-specific factors that affect resolution. Previous comparisons of the resolving power obtained with finish-line and snapshot imaging involved data sets acquired by different instruments with different instrumental resolutions. To reduce the influence of instrumental effects, we constructed a scanning laser fluorometer that can measure both snapshot and finish-line images of fluorochrome-labeled DNA. Snapshot and finish-line images of a DNA sample containing HaeII restriction fragments of the DNA from bacteriophage T7, which range in length from 474 to 6514 base pairs, were obtained under otherwise identical electrophoretic conditions. Snapshot and finish-line imaging give similar resolving powers for DNA molecules up to about 1.5 kbp long. For both imaging modes, maximum resolving power was achieved for DNA molecules between 2 and 3 kbp in length. For larger DNA molecules, finish-line imaging provided higher resolving power. The ratio of the resolving power of finish-line images to that of snapshot images increased monotonically as a function of DNA length. For the longest restriction fragments studied (6514 bp), the resolving power for finish-line images exceeded that of snapshot images by about 50%.
终点成像,即在电泳固定距离后检测DNA或其他大分子,与快照成像相比通常能提高分辨率,快照成像则是在尺寸相当的装置中对分子进行固定时间的电泳。分辨能力是不同分离方法检测紧密间隔分子种类能力的客观度量,可用于直接比较采用快照成像和终点成像系统的性能[E. A. 里贝罗和J. C. 萨瑟兰,《分析生物化学》210, 378 - 388 (1993)]。实验测定的分辨能力值既受成像方法(快照与终点)影响,也受影响分辨率的仪器特定因素影响。之前对终点成像和快照成像所获分辨能力的比较涉及由具有不同仪器分辨率的不同仪器采集的数据集。为减少仪器效应的影响,我们构建了一台扫描激光荧光计,它能测量荧光染料标记DNA的快照图像和终点图像。在其他电泳条件相同的情况下,获得了包含噬菌体T7 DNA的HaeII限制性片段(长度范围为474至6514个碱基对)的DNA样品的快照图像和终点图像。对于长度约为1.5 kbp及以下的DNA分子,快照成像和终点成像给出的分辨能力相似。对于两种成像模式,长度在2至3 kbp之间的DNA分子实现了最大分辨能力。对于更大的DNA分子,终点成像提供了更高的分辨能力。终点图像的分辨能力与快照图像的分辨能力之比随DNA长度单调增加。对于所研究的最长限制性片段(6514 bp),终点图像的分辨能力比快照图像的分辨能力高出约50%。